Arthur Crabtree wrote:Spin cutting through the Yorkshire batting. 200 lead isn't enough I don't think.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Samit not so often in the runs these days.
Somerset 49-4. And nothing for the spinners yet. Rafiq and Carver could have had a bowl off here.
westoelad wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Samit not so often in the runs these days.
Somerset 49-4. And nothing for the spinners yet. Rafiq and Carver could have had a bowl off here.
Game boiling up nicely. Somerset require 90 runs, Yorkies 5 wkts
westoelad wrote:westoelad wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Samit not so often in the runs these days.
Somerset 49-4. And nothing for the spinners yet. Rafiq and Carver could have had a bowl off here.
Game boiling up nicely. Somerset require 90 runs, Yorkies 5 wkts
25 to win,3 wkts to fall, new ball due. My money's on Yorkies.
captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:westoelad wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Samit not so often in the runs these days.
Somerset 49-4. And nothing for the spinners yet. Rafiq and Carver could have had a bowl off here.
Game boiling up nicely. Somerset require 90 runs, Yorkies 5 wkts
25 to win,3 wkts to fall, new ball due. My money's on Yorkies.
Spot on. Yorkshire win by 3 runs.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:westoelad wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Samit not so often in the runs these days.
Somerset 49-4. And nothing for the spinners yet. Rafiq and Carver could have had a bowl off here.
Game boiling up nicely. Somerset require 90 runs, Yorkies 5 wkts
25 to win,3 wkts to fall, new ball due. My money's on Yorkies.
Spot on. Yorkshire win by 3 runs.
We'd have lost by 1wkt-banker!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests