bhaveshgor wrote:Lol looks at the supposedly weak tail add 186 runs on average since 2016 and add more runs than the strong england tail.
Don't the likes of Athers or Nasser even do research.
Considering in recent times, India been using Ashwin more at number 6, can only remember 1 and half test and 3 test against NZ where they changed that tactic with Rohit coming in, but it is pretty obvious that if Rohit failed or get injured Ashwin would bat in the top 6 with them bringing in another bowler either pandya or Mishra.
3 test in Sri lanka, 2 test in WI, 1 Test against england.
so it is literally 50-50 of india using 5 bowlers or not.
Gingerfinch wrote:Will we bat out, or look to declare just after tea?
budgetmeansbudget wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:Lol looks at the supposedly weak tail add 186 runs on average since 2016 and add more runs than the strong england tail.
Don't the likes of Athers or Nasser even do research.
Considering in recent times, India been using Ashwin more at number 6, can only remember 1 and half test and 3 test against NZ where they changed that tactic with Rohit coming in, but it is pretty obvious that if Rohit failed or get injured Ashwin would bat in the top 6 with them bringing in another bowler either pandya or Mishra.
3 test in Sri lanka, 2 test in WI, 1 Test against england.
so it is literally 50-50 of india using 5 bowlers or not.
I think we get the message..... India's tail isn't as weak as everyone seems to be suggesting!
bhaveshgor wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:Lol looks at the supposedly weak tail add 186 runs on average since 2016 and add more runs than the strong england tail.
Don't the likes of Athers or Nasser even do research.
Considering in recent times, India been using Ashwin more at number 6, can only remember 1 and half test and 3 test against NZ where they changed that tactic with Rohit coming in, but it is pretty obvious that if Rohit failed or get injured Ashwin would bat in the top 6 with them bringing in another bowler either pandya or Mishra.
3 test in Sri lanka, 2 test in WI, 1 Test against england.
so it is literally 50-50 of india using 5 bowlers or not.
I think we get the message..... India's tail isn't as weak as everyone seems to be suggesting!
Well all those everyone is wrong.
Anyway do you think the tail is weak.
hopeforthebest wrote:Run rate just a dribble must be playing to use up time, wonder why. Strange, after lunch Stokes was throwing his bat now this last hour he's playing with caution.
Gingerfinch wrote:Stats wise, England's tail looks better. BUT, we are playing in India, which levels it out.
Gingerfinch wrote:Stats wise, England's tail looks better. BUT, we are playing in India, which levels it out.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:Stats wise, England's tail looks better. BUT, we are playing in India, which levels it out.
Broad averages over 20 and has a top score of 169, but we all know that since his facial injury he has become a solid number 10/11.
Gingerfinch wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:Stats wise, England's tail looks better. BUT, we are playing in India, which levels it out.
Broad averages over 20 and has a top score of 169, but we all know that since his facial injury he has become a solid number 10/11.
True, but he's a very good number 11.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests