st_brendy wrote:I'll have to use my left over money to take Yardy and Masters back off Hope, and then leave rest for the lottery I guess.
st_brendy wrote:I'll have to use my left over money to take Yardy and Masters back off Hope, and then leave rest for the lottery I guess.
Red Devil wrote:ianp1970 wrote:Red Devil wrote:ianp1970 wrote:Red Devil wrote:Ian, how are we doing the tie-breakers? I think I had Read, Ansari and Miles as tied but seem to have got 0 out of 3 whereas I guess you'd expect to get one or two if it was done randomly.
I was going to post this up but ran out of time this morning. I took the first digit of the 7th bid for each manager. Fir tied bids add the two numbers together then if the answer is odd then the first initially takes it and if it is even then the second takes it.
Will post the details later when I get a chance.
This is one bit that people struggle with each year, but I have yet to be offered a better option!
We could just take the players out of the following round and just say the two posters bid again and the highest wins.
However, we should at least have a rule that says if you lose one tie-breaker to another poster then any following ties between those two posters should alternate. It feels wrong that we had two ties between us and both players go to the same poster. Not saying its intentional or personal in any way, but systems have their peculiarities and, at the moment, if 2 posters have 10 tied bids then I think one poster would get all 10 and the other poster would get 0 - just a peculiarity that we need to change imo. I agree that it's a difficult area to get right and I am pretty sure I wouldn't have foreseen this either!
Fair point RD![]()
If we use the same system next year I will go for alternate tie-break leaders if there is more than one matching top bid from the same pair of managers.
I think we should bring it in immediately before you completely kill my team - at this rate I think I'll have lost 6 players to you which seems to make a bit of a mockery of the process - more than half a team is a bit extreme
hopeforthebest wrote:I feel I've entered a card game with a load of card sharps who are fleecing me left right and centre. I thought I understood the bidding rules but quite clearly I had no understanding at all.
ianp1970 wrote:
As there is only you and I with multiple tiebreakers between us, I would have gone down this route anywayHowever, as 4 of the 6 ties were players only bidded on in round 2, there is still another round to go...
Dilshan, McKay, Meschede and Shahzad are going to the 3rd round between the pair of us.
Ansari has gone to me as the first tiebreaker between us.
You and Bhavesh are currently jointly leading for Miles, with Sussex and myself also allowed to bid again for him in the third round.

ianp1970 wrote:Players going to a 3rd round:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests