Dr Robert wrote:sussex.
What has Roy done to keep his job?
Tell me, in detail, what you would have done differently.
Dr Robert wrote:sussex.
What has Roy done to keep his job?
Aidan11 wrote:sussexpob wrote:Quite ironic, some idiotic suggestions coming from everywhere today, the blame game is in full swing.... No one seems to realise though that its actually the "blame game" that causes most of this.
No manager had the balls to ever stamp their authority on a team because they simply cant win.... had Hodgson dropped Rooney and lost, people with revisionist tendencies would have been moaning we left out a bloke with 40 international goals for a 32 year old who hardly played.... so he picks him, and he gets it the other way.
Sacking Hodgson? Brilliant, who do we get in? An ex-player I see suggested? Who then? Worked brilliantly for Argentina and Maradona??? Do we get Shearer and his arrogant, pompous, "couldnt write enough to fill an A5 piece of paper on tactics" type??? Yeah cause what we need is bulldog spirit right?? (Did you see Jags at the end? Or the effort they put in?? POPPYCOCK!!)....
Oh, and when we played with Capello people asked for attacking football, so Hodgson attacks and gets criticised for conceding sloppy goals....
Stop talking *modded*..... England played two top 10 ranked teams and deserved at least a point from both games, arguably to win at least one of them.
They did well, the idiotic suggestions that we should revamp the whole footballing structure are stupid.
Do you really believe there is nothing wrong with English football?
Since we won the WC in 66 our best achievemets in nearly 50 years have been -
European Championships - Semis 1968, 1996
WC - Semis 1990
Look at Germany, Holland, France, Italy, Spain. They reach semi finals and finals without breaking sweat.
Until something drastically changes we will dine out forever on Geoff Hurst#s hat trick.
sussexpob wrote:Dr Robert wrote:sussex.
What has Roy done to keep his job?
Tell me, in detail, what you would have done differently.
Do you really believe there is nothing wrong with English football?
Dr Robert wrote:sussexpob wrote:Dr Robert wrote:sussex.
What has Roy done to keep his job?
Tell me, in detail, what you would have done differently.
At least got off my arris, to instruct and inspire. Imagine being a player, and looking over to see him sat there looking confused. The team he picked was ok, imo, but results matter. He's had two tournaments, which is enough.
sussexpob wrote:Dr Robert wrote:sussexpob wrote:Dr Robert wrote:sussex.
What has Roy done to keep his job?
Tell me, in detail, what you would have done differently.
At least got off my arris, to instruct and inspire. Imagine being a player, and looking over to see him sat there looking confused. The team he picked was ok, imo, but results matter. He's had two tournaments, which is enough.
Not much of a reason then.... cant remember Lippi being an animated coach, cant remember Del Bosque ever smiling or shouting.....
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Sussex is probably right things couldn't have been much differently but that's sadly indicative of the wider problem.
sussexpob wrote:Do you really believe there is nothing wrong with English football?
How many Uruguay players in their world cup team play for Penarol, the current Primera Champions??
0
How many of their team play in Uruguay full stop??
0
Where does there best player play?????
England - apparently good international quality players cant play here though because there is so much wrong with it.
Does the strength of a domestic league matter about your national team?
Apparently not
budgetmeansbudget wrote:I suppose there will come a time when we exit a tournament and people will say we did well, we couldn't have done more, we were simply beaten on the day by another quality side, but the English psyche doesn't work like that.
Dr Robert wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:I suppose there will come a time when we exit a tournament and people will we did well, we couldn't have done more, we were simply beaten on the day by another quality side, but the English psyche doesn't work like that.
There have been occasions like that. If you lose, you can always do better, but in 2002 and 2004, I thought we played good stuff, but were beaten by a better side or unlucky, like losing Rooney in a QF.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Dr Robert wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:I suppose there will come a time when we exit a tournament and people will we did well, we couldn't have done more, we were simply beaten on the day by another quality side, but the English psyche doesn't work like that.
There have been occasions like that. If you lose, you can always do better, but in 2002 and 2004, I thought we played good stuff, but were beaten by a better side or unlucky, like losing Rooney in a QF.
Probably 1990 and 1996 come to mind as well, but we do like to look for the negatives in most situations, I know I do. Its probably a coping mechanism for disappointment and the hope that things can change for the better in the future.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests