Aidan11 wrote:captaincolly wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:Warks wrap up a deserved win, mind you the difference was that century innings by Bell.
Now we await the verdict of the pitch panel. I agree with westoelad-would be very harsh to impose a penalty on an early season pitch.
Points deductions are very rare despite the 15 wickets in a day scenario occurring quite often.
I remember when Durham were playing Kent at Stockton a few years ago. The pitch was abysmal. Kenny Gardner, a club director at the time, told me there was a lot of talking went on in a private room afterwards and as he put it "We got away with it by the skin of our teeth".
So there may be some hope for Notts.
No consistency in it at all, depends on who the pitch inspector supports. As I said before, I went to that Sussex match at Bristol when there was over 20 wickets fell on the first day ( I think I read also one of the highest lbw counts in a completed first class game) and the pitch inspector refused to blame the pitch even though it was like batting on a trampoline. Apparently all the batsman got out to bad shots.....
Seems there was a bad shot jinx at Bristol, because wickets had clattered all over the place there...( I think by memory there had been 20 wickets fall or more day 1 the game before, and a similar amount before that - while Derbyshire the year after got bowled out for 44, and another 20 wickets fell as Gloucs were blown away)....
And then Hampshire got a ridiculous penalty for preparing wickets that spun a little.... while Somerset at the same time had county quality wickets producing 10 wickets per 1000 runs (wasn't there a season where nearly 900 was scored by Northants, and then a few 600 plus??).
Personally if its not dangerous a la Sabina Park 1998, then its equal for both teams and get on with it.