alfie wrote:Can't see them going for a tail starting with Robinson at seven!
Well, surely not, but I think teams are not as scared of a long tail/accommodating five bowlers as they used to be.
Fisher can hold a bat. But still not a number 7.
alfie wrote:Can't see them going for a tail starting with Robinson at seven!
sussexpob wrote:Rob Key comes out to address the nightclub incident, unable to hide his palpable frustration about the players breaching their curfew after the problems previously. He doesnt give an answer on Stokes future as Captain, saying it will be decided once the investigation is concluded (but it seems judging on what he said, that if its just a case of curfew breaking there is nothing else to answer for and he wont be fired).
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Amazing choice to go so suddenly. Wonder if NZ gave him the chance to go out at Lord's, but keep it quiet? If so he went out with a duck and an 18. But anyway, he's been only occasionally available for a while, so currently not a big loss.As I mentioned, he appeared to a huge wave of hype from the international press before he achieved anything, which I still remember as being mysterious. But eventually delivered 9500 runs at 54 to the Kiwi cause in Tests. So pretty solid numbers, including 33 tons. None of which I remember...The oddity is that a straightarrow personality was such a controversial occasional bowler!
Durhamfootman wrote:I struggle with anything Key says on this issue, tbh. He was a part of the McCullum 'doesn't matter' vibe, where drinking, chilling and golf were seen to be more valuable than practice and is now turning into Nanny Key when that was shown to be a pile of sh1te. If there's a negative drinking culture in the England set up, he's played his part in it. Crikey, it was practically encouraged for 3 years. If natural justice had taken place after the ashes debacle, then there would be a different guy in charge now, who would be in a much stronger position to start moralising
Durhamfootman wrote:Stokes absolutely shouldn't be fired
sussexpob wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Stokes absolutely shouldn't be fired
He shouldn't even be banned. He shouldn't even of had an awkward phone call from his coach or Director. He was out after a good test win with 10 days to report back to duty.... enjoy yourself Ben, its these moments you work so hard to enjoy. If I were him as a 35 year old World Cup winner, captain, most influential player, and (in most eyes) generational legend of my countries game, if someone tried to give me a bedtime I'd set fire to my contract in-front of them and walk.
sussexpob wrote:Kane Williamson retires with immediate effect from all international cricket. He will not play any more part in this tour.
sussexpob wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:I struggle with anything Key says on this issue, tbh. He was a part of the McCullum 'doesn't matter' vibe, where drinking, chilling and golf were seen to be more valuable than practice and is now turning into Nanny Key when that was shown to be a pile of sh1te. If there's a negative drinking culture in the England set up, he's played his part in it. Crikey, it was practically encouraged for 3 years. If natural justice had taken place after the ashes debacle, then there would be a different guy in charge now, who would be in a much stronger position to start moralising
Man management is about maintaining the balance of mutual respect between manager and subordinate. A manager respects the professional and personal boundaries of their subordinate to do their job using their own competence free from regular unnecessary interference, and the subordinate respects the boundaries of professional integrity and results that is required. Rob Key has set his boundaries at both extremes, which by default removes the requirement of this respect from one side; a manager who is total draconian and throws the book at people without being constructive abuses that respect he must show to his players, and a player who is allowed to operate with no expectations set on conduct or workload is free to p*ss over any expectations required of them to do their jobs to the best of their ability. Neither work at all.
I don't want to set another argument off with Alfie, but this is just another example that leaves me deeply confused about Key that I explained many times, and leaves me inclined to believe that if he can't get this stuff remotely right, what use does he have? If deep in Rob Key's brain he cant see there is a massive gulf of options available to him other than to consider it right for a player to be out 72 hours before a test at 4am drunk out his face to the point he forget his hotel, all while calling some England fan who tries to help him a D8ckhead... and then to slip to locking people in their room with a glass of cocoa at 21h00 everyday for 10 days before a test match... then I despair.
There is a middle ground, and that middle ground is just common sense. Its just good management. You win a test match and don't play for 10 days? Go out till sunrise, if you don't do anything illegal I don't care. If we get to 5-6 days and then get into our prep cycle, then I expect you on time and ready to give it your all, but I am not setting you bed time, and if you want dinner with the wife and a glass or two of wine then as long as I get 100% the next day I don't care. Match day comes, I am not telling you can't leave the hotel at night or setting you a bed time, but if you come in at 2am stinking of beer don't expect to be picked again.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests