Arthur Crabtree wrote:Reasons will have to be found for the likely big defeat. Stokes really should try and defuse stuff like this rather than set up future criticism.
Indeed. I find this sort of comment incredibly naïve, because history tells us that England's institutional errors or problems can be laid bare very quickly away in Australia. In 2006-07, Harmison bowled a wide first ball and it felt like the whole of Fletcher's era went with it in a giant fireball car crash. In 2013, Mitchell Johnson needed a few overs to destroy what was left of Flower's England. The reality is, you get outplayed in the first test, everything little detail will be played back in the Aussie press, and if England lose badly so will it be in the English press. The fact is, the pressure cooker environment tends to make this process go quick. One day you are a great side, the next the coach is being fired and 3 players are being guided into retirement mid-series.
And Fletcher/Flowers England were better than this lot. They had beat Australia, Flower had even done it away.....and yet both sides crumbled. In this team, I dont think anyone has anything other than miserable experience in Australia, save for Wood when he played a dead rubber game. Stokes record is poor, Root's record is poor...... For all the talk, the balls will not be "to the wall" at 1/2-0 down, more like shrunk and retreated.
I get the sense this will hit Stokes and Co hard. They have the least hostile press I can remember for any England cricket team ever, but that will not continue at 1-0, and will be done and dusted at 2-0. At 3-0, the ECB will already be finding someone for the post-series "rip it up and burn it" inquest.
All of these comments, all of England's management "our way or the highway" stuff..... start to lose the series, and this will be the stick that the press beat you with.