GarlicJam wrote:Fully disagree here. I went back and had about 6 reviews of it after reading your post. The position of the ball on impact did not alter once the impact happened - yes, maybe the vision of Khawaja moved on about a tenth of a second, but the impact position of the did not alter - so I fail to see what a difference this has made.
Plus, the ball was (projected to be) missing the stumps by about a full inch. That is a lot.
The live footage shows the impact of ball. Indicated on the photo is the line of the knee roll, as you can see he has been hit almost flush in the middle of the roll. His head is looking down, and his bat is coming down towards the pad.

The Hawkeye replay image is now shown below. I don't think I need to point out that the position of Khawaja is wrong on the image, its quite clear; we know the fact the ball is still left on the image on the way to second slip that its 0.5 second or so after the actual impact.

Hawkeye nevertheless plots the impact of the ball on this wrong image. Now we can quite clearly see Khawaja has gone a little more forward in the hawkeye impact. His leg is more vertical, meaning the point of impact is higher than it should be. And as indicated by the line drawn, the worn part of the pitch tells us he has stepped slightly more forward after the shot was played (real time, he takes a couple of short steps as his momentum comes forward). The net effect is, Hawkeye wrongly says he's been hit on the very top of the pad using this wrong image. The 100% unarguable proof of the real time footage shows he was not, and highlights the wrong frame being used for the assessment has quite clearly impacted the decision.
Measure the distance between the middle of the knee roll and the end of the pad, and tell me if that is more than the inch it went above the stumps?
Hawkeye got it wrong.