Arthur Crabtree wrote:It does feel a nonsensical thought. What is the next best test of a player's ability than the next best level of cricket available.
if bayliss thinks County cricket is not good enough surely he would be pushing ECB to fix it.
TBH county cricket is fine in terms of competition, player quality and likely to produce international player.
what it is not going well and affecting the players coming through it is the schedule and number of fixtures.
playing CC in april/may or September won't make good test cricket batsman bring loads of poor habits in the technique which doesn't work in the flatter decks of Test cricket and Spin bowling isn't encouraged.
County cricket quality is actually quite good, some of the div 2 teams are strong so it can't exactly be that and if County cricket was weak, Philander and overseas signing will be destroying County cricket and at the moment vast majority of overseas signings either struggle or do their average performances can't think of many having outstanding seasons that suggest county cricket is easy.
Strauss probably agrees with bayliss on County cricket considering he changed the toss rule to make pitches in county cricket more Test like.
