hopeforthebest wrote:Another VERY marginal LBW decision, this series has been full of them.
What I was about to say.
Pisses me off no end.
hopeforthebest wrote:Another VERY marginal LBW decision, this series has been full of them.
backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:pretty certain the english press act like he is a great player and not he will become one.
really the most annoying aspect is that for Stokes poor batting and poor bowling get overlooked.
barring that huge century in SA, Stokes averages about mid 20 with the bat and close to 40 with the ball.
the bowling fiqures are ok if Stokes was a proper batsman and what i seen Stokes with the bat he isn't a proper batsman and should be batting in the top 6, an number 7 bat like Ali.
really only one of Ali or Stokes should play not both of them.
Barring a few Test matches Stokes hasn't done anything in the Test cricket.
I dont read the press tbh, I just watch the games but most on here and all my mates think stokes is far from the finished product
He contributes most games whether it be with bat, ball or the field
He just hasn't got the consistency atm to contribute with all 3
But he can win games out of nothing like vs new zealand
And has shown he can take important wickets, something always happens when he is involved
His stats don't tell the full story imo and the people who pick the team agree with me
bhaveshgor wrote:backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:pretty certain the english press act like he is a great player and not he will become one.
really the most annoying aspect is that for Stokes poor batting and poor bowling get overlooked.
barring that huge century in SA, Stokes averages about mid 20 with the bat and close to 40 with the ball.
the bowling fiqures are ok if Stokes was a proper batsman and what i seen Stokes with the bat he isn't a proper batsman and should be batting in the top 6, an number 7 bat like Ali.
really only one of Ali or Stokes should play not both of them.
Barring a few Test matches Stokes hasn't done anything in the Test cricket.
I dont read the press tbh, I just watch the games but most on here and all my mates think stokes is far from the finished product
He contributes most games whether it be with bat, ball or the field
He just hasn't got the consistency atm to contribute with all 3
But he can win games out of nothing like vs new zealand
And has shown he can take important wickets, something always happens when he is involved
His stats don't tell the full story imo and the people who pick the team agree with me
good point he does create something out of nothing but that could possible be because he does everything IE Catch, bowl or bat.
think he contributes more in the field than the batting or bowling most of the time.
TBH like Stokes as a cricketer but not sure you can have him in the top 6, 7 is where he should be batting and it is ridiculous how his 2 centuries show he can bat in the top 6 considering Ali got 2 centuries and didn't get much time in the top 6 afterwards.
At the moment stokes doesn't get in with the ball or bat in the team.
Not really sure why their making Stokes a middle order batsman when he isn't one.
he was never going to average 40+ with the bat but is likely to average 30 with the bat and play freely in the lower order and contribute as the 4th seam option.
at the moment Woakes is the better prospect better bowler and better batsman.
Making_Splinters wrote:Great knock from Ali under huge pressure when he came to the crease with England in real danger of being blown away.
.
Making_Splinters wrote:Great knock from Ali under huge pressure when he came to the crease with England in real danger of being blown away.
.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: Arthur Crabtree and 3 guests