hopeforthebest wrote:Sky commentators have been going on throughout this test that bowling here is harder work because the ground is so hard, now they are moaning about Cook batting again.
hopeforthebest wrote:Sky commentators have been going on throughout this test that bowling here is harder work because the ground is so hard, now they are moaning about Cook batting again.
backfootpunch wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:backfootpunch wrote:Why are we batting![]()
We are 390 ahead
What we going to do bat for 20 overs then declare
England have bowled 63 overs in batting conditions There are 48 more to go today, batting again is a no brainer.
60 overs isn't that many really
Especially since we have 5 bowlers
bhaveshgor wrote:Rain now falling which shows how poor the decision it was.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:The rest of the day being rained off suits England's purpose just as well. They have enough runs, they just want the bowlers not to be bowling.
It's bad for the image of the game though. There's nothing duller than a third innings spent resting the bowlers. With maybe the opposition slowing the game down.
How about a rule where the follow on has to be enforced?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:The rest of the day being rained off suits England's purpose just as well. They have enough runs, they just want the bowlers not to be bowling.
It's bad for the image of the game though. There's nothing duller than a third innings spent resting the bowlers. With maybe the opposition slowing the game down.
How about a rule where the follow on has to be enforced?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:The rest of the day being rained off suits England's purpose just as well. They have enough runs, they just want the bowlers not to be bowling.
It's bad for the image of the game though. There's nothing duller than a third innings spent resting the bowlers. With maybe the opposition slowing the game down.
How about a rule where the follow on has to be enforced?
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests