sussexpob wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
Yorkshire have such strength in depth, very impressive to keep playing so well with players away on England duty.
Really good article on the Yorkshire Academy system
http://www.espncricinfo.com/county-cricket-2015/content/story/885915.html
Participation figures for each county and relative populations heavily favour Yorkshire having by far the biggest pool of players. I think the whole South East has slightly less players than Yorkshire, and that is several historical cricket counties included in the figures.
Is this anything to do with what Yorkshire are doing, or is it simply the fact that cricket is popular in this section of the country compared to other places? If anything, numbers suggest that by county, they should be producing quite a big proportion of international players.
As for the academy system at Yorkshire, I dont think that Plunkett can be included as a Yorkshire find, I would guess he was capped as a Durham player? And Ballance had played for Zimbabwe representative sides before he came to England, and I think Derbyshire signed him and gave him second grade cricket but then lost him to a Yorkshire team willing to pay him more.
With the resources Middlesex and Surrey have at their disposal, they should be producing talented players at a similar rate to Yorkshire.
25% of club cricket is played in Lancashire and Yorkshire and club cricket in Lancashire is as prolific, if not more than at Yorkshire. Another county who isn't producing as much quality cricketers as they should.
For a such a relatively new county, Durham have produced a fair few players that have gone on to represent England. It wouldn't surprise me at all in the next 10 years that Durham before a real force in county cricket.


