shankycricket wrote:Bit odd to see Foster getting the nod over Forster. Roy just getting confused with the names?or Forster being penalised for not playing in the EPL?
Foster and Hodgson were at WBA together.
shankycricket wrote:Bit odd to see Foster getting the nod over Forster. Roy just getting confused with the names?or Forster being penalised for not playing in the EPL?
SaintPowelly wrote:shankycricket wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:You do know they have only 23 men out there, right ?? Who else can he play ? other than Gerrard ?
Henderson?
He's already played twice, and Lampard is needed for his experience/leadership
shankycricket wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:shankycricket wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:You do know they have only 23 men out there, right ?? Who else can he play ? other than Gerrard ?
Henderson?
He's already played twice, and Lampard is needed for his experience/leadership
Experience? Really? In a dead rubber? When you really should be building for the future? Anyways, can't complaint much about the selection on the whole. Good to see the bench strength get a go. Hopefully, Lampard won't be any worse than Gerrard (if such a thing is even possible)..
Dr Robert wrote:Cameroon's anthem is similar to the French's La Marseillaise. Brazil to win by three.
yuppie wrote:Dr Robert wrote:Cameroon's anthem is similar to the French's La Marseillaise. Brazil to win by three.
At least, Cameroon have been shocking this world cup. Can they keep 11 on the field, and maybe not headbutt each other![]()
SO Cameroon to win 3-2......
SaintPowelly wrote:Depends on whether the ref is pro-Brazil or neutral
yuppie wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Depends on whether the ref is pro-Brazil or neutral
Brazil to go through, they have to. Its that simple...........
Aidan11 wrote:yuppie wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Depends on whether the ref is pro-Brazil or neutral
Brazil to go through, they have to. Its that simple...........
...and they will.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests