GarlicJam wrote:as I always think, it should be before the tests. 2020, ODIs, tests - appetiser, entrée, main course.
Dessert would be the post series celebrations, if suitable.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:GarlicJam wrote:as I always think, it should be before the tests. 2020, ODIs, tests - appetiser, entrée, main course.
Dessert would be the post series celebrations, if suitable.
I agree, the five ODIs after the Ashes will do nothing but flog the last reserves out of tired players, and the public will be sated by the main event. It offers the losing team an opportunity for a little consolation. And the winning team usually takes their foot off the accelerator. But no one cares much by then. If they are before the Tests, then they have significance as indicators for the main event.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:That's what I thought, that because of his ODI performances, Finn was primed for the Tests! Pitches were very different. But it creates that anticipation, whether or not the signs are later realised.
hopeforthebest wrote:They are so good an indicator as Finn showed in NZ when white ball in hand he was a great threat, then red ball in hand he couldn't buy a wicket.
englandmad666 wrote:So what would england fans like to be there prefered seam attack for the 1st ashes test?
I want (if fully fit)
Anderson
Tremlett
Broad
hopeforthebest wrote:englandmad666 wrote:So what would england fans like to be there prefered seam attack for the 1st ashes test?
I want (if fully fit)
Anderson
Tremlett
Broad
A fit and in form Bresnan would always be in my team.
shankycricket wrote:That is not going to happen, CF even though I personally would like to see the T20s being restricted to only the domestic leagues and of course, the World Cup. Honestly don't see what purpose one off or two match series have. If at all, they want bilateral T20s, have a proper 3 or 5 match series as that'd at least give it some meaning.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests