st_brendy wrote:That one was also plumb LBW.
Maybe the umpires have got wind of their early shockers or there was an inside edge into pad.
st_brendy wrote:That one was also plumb LBW.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:st_brendy wrote:That one was also plumb LBW.
Maybe the umpires have got wind of their early shockers or there was an inside edge into pad.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:I don't understand how there are 5 lbws in our innings and none in theirs?
st_brendy wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:I don't understand how there are 5 lbws in our innings and none in theirs?
Fidel was bowling for the edge, not the stumps.
Berg and Holland simply were both just dobbing the ball up there, with little movement. Sibley was blocking his way through his inninggs.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:st_brendy wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:I don't understand how there are 5 lbws in our innings and none in theirs?
Fidel was bowling for the edge, not the stumps.
Berg and Holland simply were both just dobbing the ball up there, with little movement. Sibley was blocking his way through his inninggs.
There were five bowleds!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests