Durhamfootman wrote:They'll release Rew. I have no doubt about that. Potts, we'll see. They might pull Carse out as well ahead of the ODI's
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:They'll release Rew. I have no doubt about that. Potts, we'll see. They might pull Carse out as well ahead of the ODI's
You're right. Carse not available and neither is Potts.
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:They'll release Rew. I have no doubt about that. Potts, we'll see. They might pull Carse out as well ahead of the ODI's
You're right. Carse not available and neither is Potts.
almost as if it was entirely predictable
Durhamfootman wrote: almost as if it was entirely predictable
Durhamfootman wrote:I was listening to Harmy on the 'following on' podcast yesterday and he was obviously delighted with the win over Notts. He thought that forcing a result in a match with a double centurion and 4 other centurions was a credit to the groundsman and his team. Personally I think it was a total credit to our players who managed to grab a win despite a pitch that did absolutely nothing. I thought it was a complete fuckup of a pitch. A greentop that managed to offer no help whatsoever to the bowlers. I think it's obvious that this was supposed to be a spicy pitch to level the sides up, which is why we immediately chose to field when we won the toss, but instead it was as flat as a fart and the game was won by a set of bowlers who refused to submit to the batting paradise and kept patiently chipping away with wickets. Bloody hard yakka if you ask me.
captaincolly wrote:Two wickets in 2 overs. 221/8. Can't see us getting 250!
captaincolly wrote:Excellent last wicket stand from Yusuf and Minto to get us to 250. Personally I'd have had Minto in ahead of Killeen. Surely shouldn't be batting at 11.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests