bigfluffylemon wrote:Forest 1 United 0
A very satisfying result. My father-in-law has been a Forest fan since his student days at Nottingham over 50 years ago, so he's over the moon with this season.
Durhamfootman wrote:it was bad enough when Chelsea avoided PSR sanctions last year by selling their own hotels to themselves for £76million, but now they appear to have turned this year's £70million loss into a £128million profit by selling their women's team to themselves for £198million
they're just taking the ssip aren't they?
mikesiva wrote: He's built the team around solid defence. A good goalkeeper in Sels, and two outstanding central defenders in Murillo and Malenkovic. They sit in a low block and are happy to concede the majority of possession in most of their matches, hitting teams on the counter attack through speedy wingers Elanga and Hudson Odoi, who were deemed not good enough to play for Manchester United and Chelsea respectively. That, combined with old style centre forward Wood shows that your team doesn't have to play like Barcelona and Manchester City to be successful.
Durhamfootman wrote:although seemingly their accounts have not yet been verified by the FA and signed off for this year. They are still picking over the valuations. Newcastle at end of the Ashley era, had a big ground, a 52,000+ average attendance, a squad valued at hundreds of millions and a turnover of £150million a year. The club was valued at £305 million. Chelsea women play to an average crowd of 4,000, have a squad worth a fraction of the then Newcastle squad and generate £9million a year, yet Chelsea have chosen to value this at almost £200million. Perhaps the powers that be won't accept this, but I won't be holding my breath waiting for them to make a stand..... obviously they would if it was Leicester
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests