andy wrote:His hamstring wasn't a bowling injury...he did it batting...he looked fit and firing with the ball this summer

sussexpob wrote:Stokes injured again for the rest of the county season at least, and maybe for Pakistan.
I think at this point the ECB need to choose what they want; have Stokes play in the dribble and bowling but be crippled all the time, or accept at his fitness is starting to disappear and you can have a middle order bat/captain for a few years instead. By all means a few games here and there for Durham in April or May for a bit of practice, but if he's not in the T20 side internationally, then he should be nowhere near the 100 in between test series.
I know its good to have the extra bowler for balance to the side, but he's a 33 year old who can't stay fit and has missed a lot of time recently.
Car's with loads of miles on the clock that start to breakdown a lot don't tend to get better the more you drive them..... his career will be over shortly unless his fragile fitness can be managed better.
meninblue wrote:Hamstring injury again. Speiclaist pacer Gus Atkinson bowled 35 overs in 2nd test at hamilton, Brydon 30 overs, Ben bowls 36.2. More than regular bowlers inspite of having been injured recently and needing to manage workload.
GarlicJam wrote:meninblue wrote:Hamstring injury again. Speiclaist pacer Gus Atkinson bowled 35 overs in 2nd test at hamilton, Brydon 30 overs, Ben bowls 36.2. More than regular bowlers inspite of having been injured recently and needing to manage workload.
I saw (I think) a figure yesterday of Potts bowling 9 overs out of 80. With Fragile Ben bowling 4 times as much!
I see he is not out to bat yet, I assume this injury is the reason, Atkinson is in ahead of him. This would also affect their team balance for batting - not that this should make a scrap of difference in this test, but it does add to that bit of poor thinking, imo.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest