Durhamfootman wrote:I half expected it, tbh. If no attacking, reliably wicket taking spin option is available, then a seam attack of Rushy, Potts, Carse, Raine and Stokes probably doesn't need a non threatening spinner to occupy an end while they rest. It was why I asked the question about Raine yesterday
We were inserted and are losing wickets slowly. A slow 44 for Lees, a rare failure for Dicko, a not rare at all failure for Capt Beaky. KP and Bedders at the crease 102-3
Durhamfootman wrote:whether it's because this wicket has a bit more in it for the bowlers, or whether it's just that we're crap, we'll find out in the next hour or so

captaincolly wrote:Looks as if they spent the first 2/3 of the morning gaining control and then the last 1/3 starting to lose it! Need to get this run rate under control ASAP.
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Looks as if they spent the first 2/3 of the morning gaining control and then the last 1/3 starting to lose it! Need to get this run rate under control ASAP.
Agreed. 33 runs off 4 overs is not what we need from any of our bowlers
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests