westoelad wrote:It's captaincy and selection that are my concerns,specifically deciding to bat when winning the toss,particularly at the Riverside, and the persistent selection of Coughlin who went wicketless after the 1st game.
An attack of Rushy, Raine, Potts and Salisbury is very strong,problem is there's no proven back up apart from the inconsistent Carse.
A top 3 batting of Lees, Bancroft and Borthwick should form a solid foundation for Bedingham, Harte and Burnham to build on.
Be interesting to see if Scott Steel develops at Leicester.
Durhamfootman wrote:Colly often chose to bat first, of course. We had a much stronger top order then, though. I wonder what happened to them?
Durhamfootman wrote:
Coughlin, on the other hand, is worse than useless, he's a liability too. Last year's batting average of 19 and bowling average of 101 says it all....... drinks carrier!
westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Colly often chose to bat first, of course. We had a much stronger top order then, though. I wonder what happened to them?
Judging by his size IDB ate them all.
westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:
Coughlin, on the other hand, is worse than useless, he's a liability too. Last year's batting average of 19 and bowling average of 101 says it all....... drinks carrier!
Agreed, but confined to The Stickywicket.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests