SaintPowelly wrote:And incase people think “he can’t be that bad”, he has 5-539 at over 5 an over and the 5 wickets he has have all either been number 11 or slogging for declaration
captaincolly wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:And incase people think “he can’t be that bad”, he has 5-539 at over 5 an over and the 5 wickets he has have all either been number 11 or slogging for declaration
What went wrong?
SaintPowelly wrote:captaincolly wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:And incase people think “he can’t be that bad”, he has 5-539 at over 5 an over and the 5 wickets he has have all either been number 11 or slogging for declaration
What went wrong?
Media hyped him to be much better than he ever was, based on a few T20 wickets, which lead to a terrible England debut and a back injury.
He’s a decent T20 bowler because batsmen have to take him on, in FC cricket he can be milked (also has a ridiculous no ball problem, bowled loads)
Durhamfootman wrote:are you expecting to have Dawson back for the Vitality Dribble?
SaintPowelly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:are you expecting to have Dawson back for the Vitality Dribble?
Should be, as should Vince
Durhamfootman wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:are you expecting to have Dawson back for the Vitality Dribble?
Should be, as should Vince
I think I just assumed that Vince would have a 12th man ashes series
Durhamfootman wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:are you expecting to have Dawson back for the Vitality Dribble?
Should be, as should Vince
I think I just assumed that Vince would have a 12th man ashes series
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests