captaincolly wrote:Some of the Somerset faithful think the final wicket was a bump ball!
Although The Times report doesn't mention any controversy so it might be a case of supporters seeing what they want to see.
captaincolly wrote:Some of the Somerset faithful think the final wicket was a bump ball!
captaincolly wrote:captaincolly wrote:Some of the Somerset faithful think the final wicket was a bump ball!
Although The Times report doesn't mention any controversy so it might be a case of supporters seeing what they want to see.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:captaincolly wrote:Some of the Somerset faithful think the final wicket was a bump ball!
Although The Times report doesn't mention any controversy so it might be a case of supporters seeing what they want to see.
From David Hopps ESPN report
"As Lyth raced around the outfield, pursued by exultant team-mates, his first-class tally of wickets now stretched to 29, the umpires conferred for a possible bump ball catch before ruling in Yorkshire's favour."
Without video evidence, which itself in these incidents is often inconclusive, the umpire's ruling is final. Amazing how these things go against the team who is at the bottom.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Astonishing score for Notts against Somerset.
Early wicket for Coad against Surrey who must be big favourites with Yorks England stars still away.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Obviously Sangakkara is the crucial batter, so need to get him early.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Obviously Sangakkara is the crucial batter, so need to get him early.
Didn't happen though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests