backfootpunch wrote:rich1uk wrote:backfootpunch wrote:
Hence why I said right decisionfor the wrong reason
There was a clear deflection but the umpire used it the technology incorrectly
sorry for being pedantic but i dont think he used the technology wrongly, he didn't apply the process correctly
its not the job of the 3rd umpire to decide if a batsman is out or not, his job is to decide whether the decision made by the onfield umpire was correct and is only meant to overturn if he has conclusive evidence, and i just think there was enough doubt there not to overturn it
Yes you are being pedantic
There was an obvious deflection it was out
if it was so obvious i would have thought either the onfield umpire or the TV umpire might have noticed it but neither did ...
