budgetmeansbudget wrote:Cricinfo for me Haggis, but well done on getting your name mentioned.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:When was the last time we had three centurions in the same innings?
haggishants wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:When was the last time we had three centurions in the same innings?
1992 - question just asked on air.
Terry, Middleton and Smith.
http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Score ... 55661.html
st_brendy wrote:- Somerset take these final two wickets
- We rock along at around 4 an over, and score 330 in 80 overs
- We reduce Surrey to 25-3 at the close
I guess that would be the equivalent of an early Xmas for us tomorrow. (Middlesex and Yorkshire having good days tomorrow would also be useful, but not as important)
haggishants wrote:st_brendy wrote:- Somerset take these final two wickets
- We rock along at around 4 an over, and score 330 in 80 overs
- We reduce Surrey to 25-3 at the close
I guess that would be the equivalent of an early Xmas for us tomorrow. (Middlesex and Yorkshire having good days tomorrow would also be useful, but not as important)
Declared 253 ahead.
2 or 3 wickets now would make this a great prediction from you Brendy!
st_brendy wrote:After just one day, I think the updated table looks like:
Warks 156
Lancs 153
Durham 151
Hants 138
Notts 119
Lancs won't move from 153 over the next three days, due to not playing. Whilst Warks will either stay on 156, or jump up to 172. Still bonus points, and ether draw points or win points, up for grabs for rest of us. If we take, say, three more bonus points (one bowling, two batting) and add in five draw points, that's 146. Potentially just 10 behind Warks therefore, with one game left -which is less than the difference between a draw and a win.
(We'd be even closer to Lancs, and potentially Durham too, but with both sides still to play again next week first)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests