Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
Yorkshire have such strength in depth, very impressive to keep playing so well with players away on England duty.
captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
Yorkshire have such strength in depth, very impressive to keep playing so well with players away on England duty.
hopeforthebest wrote:captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
Yorkshire have such strength in depth, very impressive to keep playing so well with players away on England duty.
Warwickshire were doing it for years with Bell, Trott and then Woaks unavailable. I's the price of success.
Making_Splinters wrote:captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks, 11 points behind early season pacesetters Durham, with a game in hand. Well placed given the difficulty of operating without established stars.
Yorkshire have such strength in depth, very impressive to keep playing so well with players away on England duty.
Really good article on the Yorkshire Academy system
http://www.espncricinfo.com/county-cricket-2015/content/story/885915.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests