westoelad wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:While we could stay up, it doesn't change the fact that we need a serious rebuild if we are going to start competing with the top sides. Lancashire feels very much like an international venue first and a county side second at present. It is hard to understand why we have so much talent coming into the side with so little to show for it long term.
One of the reasons Yorkshire and Durham have successful youth policies is because there's a strong infra-structure of high standard and competitive league cricket who feed youngsters into their academies. Lancs also have,or certainly had, a strong league system so should be able to be equally effective. What sort of message,thiugh, is being given to their Academy prospects when the club sign the likes of Ali, White ands now Buck from outside?
SaintPowelly wrote:Wonder how much was spent on Flintoff.
westoelad wrote:Well Butler was probably the most crass signing of all. It was pretty obvious that he was going to be hot-housed into the England set up and lost to County cricket as has happened. Prince has been a quality signing with the young batting buit around him. It was only with Benks and Divo in the side that Durham started developing batsmen.
Making_Splinters wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Wonder how much was spent on Flintoff.
Next to nothing, he was given a percentage of the gates.
Durhamfootman wrote:How does a draw affect Lancs?
Making_Splinters wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:How does a draw affect Lancs?
It'd put them 16 points ahead of us meaning we'd have to win and out bonus point them as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests