SaintPowelly wrote:Has Luke Wright officially given up bowling ??
sussexpob wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Has Luke Wright officially given up bowling ??
Never really bowled much ever. Id be surprised if he has ever had much more than one wicket per match for a county season.
SaintPowelly wrote:sussexpob wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Has Luke Wright officially given up bowling ??
Never really bowled much ever. Id be surprised if he has ever had much more than one wicket per match for a county season.
I noticed he didn't bowl in the 50over or T20s either, wondered if he was carrying an injury or focusing purely on batting.
sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wright has gone at last. The game is just about winnable.
Yorkshire would have to play rather badly not to win this.
If only a certain Yorkshire all rounder was actually serving a ban for cheating, we might have stood a chance. It seems that wasn't to be, he was simply asked not to cheat again.
Let that be a lesson kids... chuck all you want, if you get found out, you can still play next match.
D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wright has gone at last. The game is just about winnable.
Yorkshire would have to play rather badly not to win this.
If only a certain Yorkshire all rounder was actually serving a ban for cheating, we might have stood a chance. It seems that wasn't to be, he was simply asked not to cheat again.
Let that be a lesson kids... chuck all you want, if you get found out, you can still play next match.
A bit like Kirtley did, I suppose. How long was we chucking for Sussex?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/sussex/4352770.stm
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorks need about a hundred in a session. Must be in with a chance here.
sussexpob wrote:D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wright has gone at last. The game is just about winnable.
Yorkshire would have to play rather badly not to win this.
If only a certain Yorkshire all rounder was actually serving a ban for cheating, we might have stood a chance. It seems that wasn't to be, he was simply asked not to cheat again.
Let that be a lesson kids... chuck all you want, if you get found out, you can still play next match.
A bit like Kirtley did, I suppose. How long was we chucking for Sussex?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/sussex/4352770.stm
Check the 2006 county season and tell me how much he played at the start? You will find he didn't come in to the side until half way, despite being an international bowler who was fit.
The reason? The ECB suspended him.
His action was cleared in Feb/March before the season.
D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wright has gone at last. The game is just about winnable.
Yorkshire would have to play rather badly not to win this.
If only a certain Yorkshire all rounder was actually serving a ban for cheating, we might have stood a chance. It seems that wasn't to be, he was simply asked not to cheat again.
Let that be a lesson kids... chuck all you want, if you get found out, you can still play next match.
A bit like Kirtley did, I suppose. How long was we chucking for Sussex?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/sussex/4352770.stm
Check the 2006 county season and tell me how much he played at the start? You will find he didn't come in to the side until half way, despite being an international bowler who was fit.
The reason? The ECB suspended him.
His action was cleared in Feb/March before the season.
So what? How long was Kirtley allowed to chuck before they finally got wise to him? A bit longer than Williamson has for Yorkshire.
Yorkshire closing in on victory. Currently listening to commentary from Radio Leeds with a rather depressed sounding person in the background broadcasting on Retirement Radio for all the listeners in Sussex.
sussexpob wrote:D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:D/L wrote:sussexpob wrote:Yorkshire would have to play rather badly not to win this.
If only a certain Yorkshire all rounder was actually serving a ban for cheating, we might have stood a chance. It seems that wasn't to be, he was simply asked not to cheat again.
Let that be a lesson kids... chuck all you want, if you get found out, you can still play next match.
A bit like Kirtley did, I suppose. How long was we chucking for Sussex?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/sussex/4352770.stm
Check the 2006 county season and tell me how much he played at the start? You will find he didn't come in to the side until half way, despite being an international bowler who was fit.
The reason? The ECB suspended him.
His action was cleared in Feb/March before the season.
So what? How long was Kirtley allowed to chuck before they finally got wise to him? A bit longer than Williamson has for Yorkshire.
Yorkshire closing in on victory. Currently listening to commentary from Radio Leeds with a rather depressed sounding person in the background broadcasting on Retirement Radio for all the listeners in Sussex.
More likely depressed because he is in Scarborough...
pompeymeowth wrote:Chopper and Mags have made light work of Lyth and Lees.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests