Centuryclub wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Centuryclub wrote:Ajmal 7 Hants 0.
Having just got in it's fascinating to read all the posts during play today on this thread! A mix of positivity & gloom - optimism & realism!
After a century partnership we have really been found lacking.
Against a decent CC2 side our batting suddenly looks rather weak.
I think we played the other bowlers ok, Ajmal destroyed us single handedly. He is way above the standard of bowling in div 1 let alone div 2.
Have we got a bowler of similar standard who will provide the vital cutting edge when batsmen get stuck in? (I think i know the answer!)
If we were promoted this season (after Worcs?) would we do a Derbyshire & come straight back down?
Slug will prob go after he gets a benefit but seems to be in a poorish run & Carbs is so erratic with Jimmy unable to get the big scores atm.
Can't disagree with that Budget. Across both innings so far, Ajmal has taken 8-70. The rest have taken 3-175.
We've not crumbled to a better side. We've hardly thrown away a solid start. We've simply been done by one of the best bowler's in the world.
Without him this season, Worcs do not get promoted. Without him next season, Worcs come straight back down (assuming they do get promoted).
We are a better team than there, I am 100% confident of that. At 107-1 we had every chance of overtaking their 402. But they have the best bowler in the county cricket, simple as that. If we get knocked over tomorrow and lose by an innings, as it's fair to think we will, I wont be annoyed or disappointed. I have no issues with someone like Ajmal running through us. I'm just thankful that they only gave him three overs this evening. With only 14 overs to bowl, I'd have opened with him.