clubcricketeradi wrote:If Dhoni hadn't been the captain he would have been dropped for his keeping.
cricketfan90 wrote:Nayar is average at best...although IMO so's Irfan..

shankycricket wrote:Don't see why India need an allrounder at home, where you play 2 spinners. The 2 spinners will do majority of the bowling anyway. Its away from home when India play 3 seamers and 1 spinner that a 5th bowler i.e. a 4th seamer might be required to share the workload as the spinner won't get much assistance in the 1st innings and the 3 seamers might get overbowled.
I think India could look at Bhuvneshwar and Irfan as the seam bowling allrounders abroad. At home, just pick a specialist batsman at 6 and go in with 4 frontline bowlers, 2 seamers and 2 spinners.
Red Devil wrote:shankycricket wrote:Don't see why India need an allrounder at home, where you play 2 spinners. The 2 spinners will do majority of the bowling anyway. Its away from home when India play 3 seamers and 1 spinner that a 5th bowler i.e. a 4th seamer might be required to share the workload as the spinner won't get much assistance in the 1st innings and the 3 seamers might get overbowled.
I think India could look at Bhuvneshwar and Irfan as the seam bowling allrounders abroad. At home, just pick a specialist batsman at 6 and go in with 4 frontline bowlers, 2 seamers and 2 spinners.
yep - would have to agree
Bhuvneshwar and Irfan are the two all-round options, I'd be tempted to play them both - a fit Varun Aaron and Umesh Yadav would probably be the other two seamers for me - with Ishant in the frame depending on his form. Dinda doesn't look too bad but it is early days
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests