ddb wrote:Players have bad days.
They hardly went after him in the 3rd ODI when he conceded 30 runs in 10 overs.
agree, i think ashwin is a tremendous young talent.
ddb wrote:Players have bad days.
They hardly went after him in the 3rd ODI when he conceded 30 runs in 10 overs.
ddb wrote:Players have bad days.
They hardly went after him in the 3rd ODI when he conceded 30 runs in 10 overs.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
but agree with the timing. But reading his whole interview, he sounds balanced on the whole, it's just cricinfo have selected specific comments.Gambhir admitted his form has been disappointing in the series and he was nervous to start with. But things have picked up lately for him.
"The conditions are very different. There's a lot of bounce. To start with, you are far more nervous and in anxiety poke at the ball.
"Gradually, you get the feel of bowlers and what's their game plan. I hadn't known it at the start of the series. Then you start preparing differently and work out the areas where you could score runs.
"It was disappointing initially but then after Sydney, I felt far more comfortable in first innings in Perth.
The Delhi opener though has no plans to change his batting style for the series.
"Whatever your game plans are, you need to stick to it. You can't change it in the middle of Tests or you get confused. In international cricket, you need to have a game plan where you score runs, what's your strength, what you need to be careful about," Gambhir said.
"Test cricket is about percentage cricket. You need to cut down on a lot of areas where the bowlers can get you out," he added.
Red Devil wrote:http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-india-2011/content/current/story/550433.html
well said that man!![]()
![]()
![]()
Indian curators really need a talking to - Ind at home should absolutely be preparing wickets to suit us and make life difficult for the visitors. A wicket that turns from day 1 is equally as valid as a pitch that is hard, bouncy and has lots of grass, which is what we get away from home all the time.
sportbloggeradi wrote:Openers Sehwag and Gautam are clearly a major issue on this tour. The No3 and middle orders are virtually opening the batting. One series in subcontinent will get everyone back in form though.
shankybiggestengfan wrote:sportbloggeradi wrote:Openers Sehwag and Gautam are clearly a major issue on this tour. The No3 and middle orders are virtually opening the batting. One series in subcontinent will get everyone back in form though.
Yes openers havent done great.But thats no excuse for the middle order failing.Aussie openers didnt score much in the first and the second tests and look what Punter and Clarke(and Huss at Adelaide) did to India.
The Indian middle order is better IMO.But they just havent performed barring Sachin.
Dravid's exceptional series in England should not mask the fact that he has been a passenger for the most part of the last 4 and a half years and should have probably gone after SA.Lax was excellent form 2008-2010 but hasnt looked like buying a run in his past 2 overseas series.Its time to move on from these 2.Not only because they havent scored runs but they seem to have lost their reflexes.I have immense respect for both and it feels sad to say this but I cant see India progressing if these 2 are still in the Test side come November.
IMO Sehwag should move down the order.I think that would help him regain his form and also provide the much needed experience to the middle order alongside Sachin.
Mukund can open with Gambhir and Rahane can slot in at 3.
Red Devil wrote:shankybiggestengfan wrote:sportbloggeradi wrote:Openers Sehwag and Gautam are clearly a major issue on this tour. The No3 and middle orders are virtually opening the batting. One series in subcontinent will get everyone back in form though.
Yes openers havent done great.But thats no excuse for the middle order failing.Aussie openers didnt score much in the first and the second tests and look what Punter and Clarke(and Huss at Adelaide) did to India.
The Indian middle order is better IMO.But they just havent performed barring Sachin.
Dravid's exceptional series in England should not mask the fact that he has been a passenger for the most part of the last 4 and a half years and should have probably gone after SA.Lax was excellent form 2008-2010 but hasnt looked like buying a run in his past 2 overseas series.Its time to move on from these 2.Not only because they havent scored runs but they seem to have lost their reflexes.I have immense respect for both and it feels sad to say this but I cant see India progressing if these 2 are still in the Test side come November.
IMO Sehwag should move down the order.I think that would help him regain his form and also provide the much needed experience to the middle order alongside Sachin.
Mukund can open with Gambhir and Rahane can slot in at 3.
so you suggest Mukund, Gambhir, Rahane, Sachin, Sehwag, Kohli ... ???
I'd argue that Rohit and Pujara should be coming in for Dravid and VVS ... don't think Mukund should be ahead of those 2 and if that means Viru opening in India then i think that's fine. Probably a choice between rahane and Gambhir for the other slot
ddb wrote:Pujara is better than Mukund, Rahane, Kohli and perhaps even Rohit IMO from the little we've seen of them in Int cricket. Rahane is in the current side as a back up opener really. Pujara isn't going for that spot.
His main problem is his knees both now have been operated on I think...
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests