rich1uk wrote:
having a genuine leg spinner capable of batting at #6 or #7 is something almost any side in world cricket would love to have and i think england maybe rushed him a little as he could have been the missing link in our side from a balance perspective.
D/L wrote:The selectors should take most of the responsibility for Rashid’s disappointments. They selected him for ODIs, when his domestic one-day performances weren’t great and they passed him over for test selection when he had performed well in the Championship. It was not one of their better decisions.
Rashid now has to perform well at Yorkshire and make the selectors pick him again. This, time, with a bit of luck, they may pick him for the right format.

Slipstream wrote:I believe Rashid shoud have been the second spinner when we went to the WI and Flower was deciding whether to take the job. As for that over that went for 25, Cook should have held his nerve. Even de Villiers said he could have come in the next over and got a wicket and they were surprised he didn't get another over. He went out to the Big Bash and was the second leading wicket taker in the series and in the winning team with excellent figures. I think he is a great little character.
Desktop Hoggy wrote:D/L wrote:The selectors should take most of the responsibility for Rashid’s disappointments. They selected him for ODIs, when his domestic one-day performances weren’t great and they passed him over for test selection when he had performed well in the Championship. It was not one of their better decisions.
Rashid now has to perform well at Yorkshire and make the selectors pick him again. This, time, with a bit of luck, they may pick him for the right format.
Ironically England should've selected Rashid for the ODI tour of India rather than Borthwick, as he was amongst the wickets in CB40.
I've said this before and i'll say it again, it was only until 2010 when Dilly became a genuine bowler who can play in all formats. Last year his form and confidence suffered in County Cricket because Andrew Gale was bowling Rashid just to avoid a negative over-rate.
If Rashid has aspirations to play for England, for me he has got to leave Yorkshire.

D/L wrote:And Bresnan has another central contract...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/24626709
I thought his current and recent injury problems may have seen him without a full central contract this year. It shows, I suppose, how highly the ECB rate him and suggests, hopefully, favourable reports from the medical team.
Not at all sorry to see Morgan lose his central contract.

Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests