Durhamfootman wrote:https://www.durhamcricket.co.uk/match-centre/
3 down now
one each for Carse, Coughlin and now Potts
Durhamfootman wrote:wickets for Salisbury and Borthwick
Runs for Lees and Eckersley, currently 78-0 with Burnham and Poynter batting
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:wickets for Salisbury and Borthwick
Runs for Lees and Eckersley, currently 78-0 with Burnham and Poynter batting
Is there anything significant about Poynter batting up the order? Surely they're not considering him for the BWT side? But if he's not in contention why give him batting practice?
Durhamfootman wrote:49 for Lees, 78 not for Jones. Dickson expected to bat at 4 and Poynter down as keeper again
148-1 against what looks like a strong Warks bowling unit
captaincolly wrote:Just noticed that the scorecard has Lees as captain so chances are Poynter is incorrectly down as keeper.
Users browsing this forum: sussexpob and 2 guests