Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Whilst I would always welcome Badger, I had reservations about Rocky but I understand his young child has health issues so if he needs to return for family support then clearly he'd be most welcome.

westoelad wrote:Whilst I would always welcome Badger, I had reservations about Rocky but I understand his young child has health issues so if he needs to return for family support then clearly he'd be most welcome.

Would clearly improve the team and perhaps there's been enough water under the bridge by now but I'd also prefer the other one!

Durhamfootman wrote:If it was us, would that mean Stonetosspot would want a move back?

Does he want to play second fiddle to Alex Lees

Alviro Patterson wrote:

Durhamfootman wrote:If it was us, would that mean Stonetosspot would want a move back?

Does he want to play second fiddle to Alex Lees

I didn't think of that!

The most relevant factor is the number of Surrey players now centrally contracted- Burns,Roy, T & S Curran with Pope inevitably to follow them. 5 Surrey players who were regulars in their team are now effectively employed by England meaning Surrey can't release any more regulars of last season's squad.

I see that Pudsey fancies playing for the USA. Seemingly his wife is American, they intend to reside in America once his county playing career is over, and he thinks it is not beyond the realms of possibility that he might still be capable of playing for them once his 3 years residency is up, and if he isn't, then he'd like to get involved with the team in some other capacity.

I'm not sure how long his Surrey contract has left to run. Is he mid thirties now?

Durhamfootman wrote:I see that Pudsey fancies playing for the USA. Seemingly his wife is American, they intend to reside in America once his county playing career is over, and he thinks it is not beyond the realms of possibility that he might still be capable of playing for them once his 3 years residency is up, and if he isn't, then he'd like to get involved with the team in some other capacity.

I'm not sure how long his Surrey contract has left to run. Is he mid thirties now?

He's 35. He's owned property in America and been involved in promoting and coaching there for a number of years.

westoelad wrote:

Durhamfootman wrote:I see that Pudsey fancies playing for the USA. Seemingly his wife is American, they intend to reside in America once his county playing career is over, and he thinks it is not beyond the realms of possibility that he might still be capable of playing for them once his 3 years residency is up, and if he isn't, then he'd like to get involved with the team in some other capacity.

I'm not sure how long his Surrey contract has left to run. Is he mid thirties now?

He's 35. He's owned property in America and been involved in promoting and coaching there for a number of years.

There was an interview where he mentioned doing some new fitness training in order to prolong his career. Looked on the Sorry website and his contract runs until the end of 2021.

Canny money if you can get it -played nine games for Sorry last season across all formats. No mug is Pudsey- nor his agent.

The online members forum is now on the website. I shall watch it later

I've listened to it now.

MCC have decided that they will keep this year's membership subscriptions...... a paltry £7.8 million regardless of whether there is any cricket this year. Tim Bostock also revealed that the MCC aren't too worried about members resigning in disgust because there is a 22 year waiting list for membership

Different world!

Did you ask the question about the nursery ground, WL?

Yes, it's ready for use apparently.I assume it's situated behind the Finchale end.

It'll be interesting to see it when we get the chance. I note that it will also be used for women's and boys cricket too

Some interesting revelations here.We are one of the main protagonists for playing some cricket as one of 3 counties, others being Surrey and Sussex, who form the Professional Games Group(PGG) charged with getting this season up and running. I thought Bostock seemed pretty certain of the proposed schedule at the Zoom forum.
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id ... rn-playing

westoelad wrote:Some interesting revelations here.We are one of the main protagonists for playing some cricket as one of 3 counties, others being Surrey and Sussex, who form the Professional Games Group(PGG) charged with getting this season up and running. I thought Bostock seemed pretty certain of the proposed schedule at the Zoom forum.
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id ... rn-playing

That has to be another indication that our finances are in goid shape. Quite surprised to read that Somerset aren't in as healthy a position as expectedl. That said I can understand sone counties reluctance- full expenditure but little or no revenue although if this 2m rule goes ( and it sounds as if it will be gone by early July to aid the hospitality sector) it should help.