captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Northants were 30-0 after 10.4 overs. Now I thought that after 10.4 overs sides had to be either 14-3 or 16-3, so it seems Northants are playing by different rules to the rest of us, which doesn't sound fair. If they are going to play the game, then they should play it properly, imo, and stop bending the rules to suit themselves
There should be a points deduction for not losing wickets and a further one for scoring more than 2 an over.
captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
Durhamfootman wrote:In the absence of Matt Salisbury, it seems that Bryden Carse (nice 77 btw) has been given the job of feeding the opposition early boundaries
captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
doubtless they'll go on and score 501 now
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
doesn't help matters. do we know who the guilty parties were?
westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
doesn't help matters. do we know who the guilty parties were?
3 apparently -all Burnham, one a dolly.
captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Apparently they have already dropped two catches!
doesn't help matters. do we know who the guilty parties were?
3 apparently -all Burnham, one a dolly.
Typical.
A few spots of rain and the covers are on. One of those times where they'd play through the drizzle but not start in it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests