cricketfan90 wrote:we wont top div2 unfortunately Grayson is putting an emphasis on youth in the CC,and the club have already said they are priotising the 20 20 stuff this year
captaincolly wrote:cricketfan90 wrote:we wont top div2 unfortunately Grayson is putting an emphasis on youth in the CC,and the club have already said they are priotising the 20 20 stuff this year
I think Lancs will get promotion. Not convinced about Surrey even if KP and Sanga score loads of runs.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:cricketfan90 wrote:we wont top div2 unfortunately Grayson is putting an emphasis on youth in the CC,and the club have already said they are priotising the 20 20 stuff this year
I think Lancs will get promotion. Not convinced about Surrey even if KP and Sanga score loads of runs.
It'll be a very hollow triumph if they do so on the backs of Kolpaks and mercenaries. What message are they sending to their youth with such a policy?
Making_Splinters wrote:westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:cricketfan90 wrote:we wont top div2 unfortunately Grayson is putting an emphasis on youth in the CC,and the club have already said they are priotising the 20 20 stuff this year
I think Lancs will get promotion. Not convinced about Surrey even if KP and Sanga score loads of runs.
It'll be a very hollow triumph if they do so on the backs of Kolpaks and mercenaries. What message are they sending to their youth with such a policy?
Not entirely convinced that's fair comment to be honest. As I said in my season review, our problem is not producing young players but developing them at first class level which will be the biggest challenge Giles faces. We've awarded three youth players contracts this season, so the message is clear - perform and you'll be given a chance. Sadly we're lacking the seasoned pros who you expect to knock up 1000 runs a season which is why we've needed to bring in players from outside our youth system. Aside from Yorkshire and Durham, which top team is based off their own backs?
westoelad wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:cricketfan90 wrote:we wont top div2 unfortunately Grayson is putting an emphasis on youth in the CC,and the club have already said they are priotising the 20 20 stuff this year
I think Lancs will get promotion. Not convinced about Surrey even if KP and Sanga score loads of runs.
It'll be a very hollow triumph if they do so on the backs of Kolpaks and mercenaries. What message are they sending to their youth with such a policy?
Not entirely convinced that's fair comment to be honest. As I said in my season review, our problem is not producing young players but developing them at first class level which will be the biggest challenge Giles faces. We've awarded three youth players contracts this season, so the message is clear - perform and you'll be given a chance. Sadly we're lacking the seasoned pros who you expect to knock up 1000 runs a season which is why we've needed to bring in players from outside our youth system. Aside from Yorkshire and Durham, which top team is based off their own backs?
It's a superfcial comment by one looking in from the outside-you know the Lancs set up far better than me. It's getting the right seasoned pros rather than the mercenariies. Have Ali,White andJarvis been shrewd signings? Will Buck and Pietersen be,even resigning Prince given his age?
captaincolly wrote:Is Solanki still with Surrey or did he retire/get released? I don't remember hearing anything so assume he is still there.
Making_Splinters wrote:captaincolly wrote:Is Solanki still with Surrey or did he retire/get released? I don't remember hearing anything so assume he is still there.
They gave him a new one year contract at the end of last season.
captaincolly wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:captaincolly wrote:Is Solanki still with Surrey or did he retire/get released? I don't remember hearing anything so assume he is still there.
They gave him a new one year contract at the end of last season.
Thanks.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wasn't Siddle at Lancs?
captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Wasn't Siddle at Lancs?
Yes. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/31747310
I'd forgotten he had signed for them!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests