SaintPowelly wrote:Same squad as the Kent game for Sunday. Akram presumably remains 12th man.
Centuryclub wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Same squad as the Kent game for Sunday. Akram presumably remains 12th man.
Wonder if it needs tweaking a bit as we seem to have lost our mojo.
Hopefully old hands such as Jimmy, Carbs & Slug will lead the way over the finishing line with 3 games to go. Need at least 2 wins?
st_brendy wrote:Centuryclub wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Same squad as the Kent game for Sunday. Akram presumably remains 12th man.
Wonder if it needs tweaking a bit as we seem to have lost our mojo.
Hopefully old hands such as Jimmy, Carbs & Slug will lead the way over the finishing line with 3 games to go. Need at least 2 wins?
That clearly implies that you think we might need to win all three.
We're eight points ahead of Surrey, who only have two games left. It's practically impossible that they could finish above us if we only win two of our final three. We'd also have more wins than them, so an eight point gap is actually more an eight and a half point gap.
And ok there is also Essex (same number of games as us) and Kent (game in hand on us), but we're a full 20 points ahead of Essex (almost one whole game's worth of points) and a massive 41 points ahead of Kent (almost a whole two game's worth of points).
The question is therefore whether or not ONE more win for us will be enough, not whether or not two more wins will be.
BringBackJesty wrote:Not only have Leicestershire not won a cc game this year, but they didn't win one last year either. However, before we all start getting too carried away, I think their last win, at the end of the previous season was against us.
We've all supported Hants for long enough to know how this works........
SaintPowelly wrote:Leicester win the toss and bat.
Centuryclub wrote:Just arrived at the ground. Come on Hampshireeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
If Leics are 80-1 at lunchtime, as the film advert said, "Be afraid, be very afraid!"
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Centuryclub wrote:Just arrived at the ground. Come on Hampshireeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
If Leics are 80-1 at lunchtime, as the film advert said, "Be afraid, be very afraid!"
If we're serious about promotion I think we need to have them at least 3/4 down by lunchtime.
Centuryclub wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Centuryclub wrote:Just arrived at the ground. Come on Hampshireeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
If Leics are 80-1 at lunchtime, as the film advert said, "Be afraid, be very afraid!"
If we're serious about promotion I think we need to have them at least 3/4 down by lunchtime.
Definitely! Which wicket partnership will hold us up for at least a session though? As BBJ said this is Hampshire!
If Bournemouth can get a point at Norwich (amazingly their 9th consecutive visit there without losing although their first league meeting for 54 years!), then Leics can spring a surprise. There are always a few shocks at the end of the season - teams lose undefeated CC records, some unknown player gets 6+ wickets or a very fast ton but never repeats the feat, teams blood unknown players - Hants did this with 2 bowlers in the 90's (?) and Graham Hick absolutely took us to the cleaners!
The Cricket Paper reports that 3 of the top 4 runscorers in CC2 are Hants players! Hopefully Smith & Jimmy can join Vince on 1000 runs but Adams may create an unusual record by managing to do it without getting a ton! Once a Glos player (Green?) got 2000 runs without a ton!
Noticeable that Carbs is not up there at all - this may be the end of his international career - he never seemed to get a proper chance in limited overs cricket.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests