SaintPowelly wrote:100 for Trott.
SaintPowelly wrote:100 for Trott.
SaintPowelly wrote:Warks 62/6 against Sussex.
Umpire O'Shaughnessy said at lunch its the best wicket he has seen in years, good to bat on, bit of turn, bit of bounce. So Warks must be batting poorly.
captaincolly wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Warks 62/6 against Sussex.
Umpire O'Shaughnessy said at lunch its the best wicket he has seen in years, good to bat on, bit of turn, bit of bounce. So Warks must be batting poorly.
If they lose it'll probably end their title hopes & a Sussex win could put Middlesex in trouble-think they've got Durham & Lancs to play.
pompeymeowth wrote:captaincolly wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Warks 62/6 against Sussex.
Umpire O'Shaughnessy said at lunch its the best wicket he has seen in years, good to bat on, bit of turn, bit of bounce. So Warks must be batting poorly.
If they lose it'll probably end their title hopes & a Sussex win could put Middlesex in trouble-think they've got Durham & Lancs to play.
That's it 99 all out! I have no idea when we last did the double on Warks? A long time ago.

pompeymeowth wrote:captaincolly wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Warks 62/6 against Sussex.
Umpire O'Shaughnessy said at lunch its the best wicket he has seen in years, good to bat on, bit of turn, bit of bounce. So Warks must be batting poorly.
If they lose it'll probably end their title hopes & a Sussex win could put Middlesex in trouble-think they've got Durham & Lancs to play.
That's it 99 all out! I have no idea when we last did the double on Warks? A long time ago.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests