hopeforthebest wrote:I believe 5 days is fundamental to the game and a change to 4 days would ensure many drawn games. You have throw away all the test records and start again and break the historic link with all the great players of the past. Test cricket can lose hours to bad weather and still get a result that wouldn't be possible in four days.
hopeforthebest wrote:If the distance of a marathon was reduced to 20 miles would it still be a marathon and the great test of stamina and speed that it is.
hopeforthebest wrote:I believe 5 days is fundamental to the game and a change to 4 days would ensure many drawn games. You have throw away all the test records and start again and break the historic link with all the great players of the past. Test cricket can lose hours to bad weather and still get a result that wouldn't be possible in four days.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:I believe 5 days is fundamental to the game and a change to 4 days would ensure many drawn games. You have throw away all the test records and start again and break the historic link with all the great players of the past. Test cricket can lose hours to bad weather and still get a result that wouldn't be possible in four days.
I agree mostly. If it's not five days, it's not Test cricket, it's another game. You can argue that cricket survived the change from timeless Tests (and we don't have a problem with the knock on effect on stats) but if we start limiting first innings it's another game. Call it something else. Given how integral and necessary for the game the fifth day has been over the years, when I hear someone say they want to preserve Tests by making them four day, I actually don't believe them, and I don't trust them.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Good old BCCI.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests