westoelad wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but in 2 and a half seasons Benks has overseen a promotion,maintained 1st division status and this season has had lost a whole bowling attack to injury and also lost 2 of your leading batsmen. Not surprisingly,then, you struggle. I got to know Benks pretty well when he was at Durham. Believe me, he 's a very knowledgeable cricketer and a top man. Be careful what you wish for particularly when you can't think of anyone to succeed him. Thought Hants looked a more than decent side on their last 2 visits to the Riverside.
We just got promoted in his first season, in a year where there wasn't a big name (Surrey, Yorkshire, Middlesex etc) to have to compete against. Some of the sides in D2 really are awful.
We just survived in his second year, thanks almost entirely to an express paceman from the WI and a kid from our youth team.
We're currently bottom of the table in his third year.
We've gone backwards in t20. Yes we made two finals day in his first two years, but that was on the back of four years of finals days - he walked into a good t20 team already. And actually, as I recall, in both years we scraped through the group stage. I give him no credit for taking us to either finals day. We've also gone backwards in one-day cricket, having won in 2012 and getting to the SF in 2013, the two years immediately before he came in.
He's stuck by Adams and Smith for far too long. He picks his boy Wheal, even though it's clear he is totally out of his depth in first class cricket. He started to block Briggs' path into our one-day XI let alone our four-day XI, which led to us losing him a year early to Sussex. He appears to have it in for Wheater and Tomlinson. He plays the likes of Best and Fidel in limited overs cricket, despite the fact that their pace makes them painfully expensive. Whilst I don't know how involved he is on the contracts/signing players side of things, our squad gets smaller and smaller under his reign and (Topley aside - oh, and his mate Wheal) every player who we have signed under him has been over the age of 30.
Rarely, if ever, in his interviews did he come across as a positive or motivating character. It was just constant negativity and having a go at the players. And that's when he bothered to give the interviews. A lot of time it was still Giles White, despite him not being the first team coach anymore.
In two and a half years, Dawson is arguably the only player who has improved under his watch. In two and a half years! And that was in part due to a two week loan spell away from the club at Essex!
Good to know that we've played well at the Riverside in the last past two years. Just a shame about the other 15 games. And all the limited overs games.
I think every Hampshire fan would accept us going completely backwards in limited overs cricket (there are three formats of cricket), if he had turned us around in first class cricket. But he hasn't. At best, we're just as bad as we were previously. So the going backwards in limited overs cricket isn't acceptable. And in all due respect, your victory against us in 2007 aside, you haven't been a great limited overs teams over the years, so it's not a surprise that he hasn't turned out to be of much use to us in those two formats.
I would be surprised if there are any Hampshire fans upset by this news.