Page 1 of 5
Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sat Jan 11, 2025 9:58 pm
by Durhamfootman
starts tonight
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sat Jan 11, 2025 9:59 pm
by Durhamfootman
3 ODI's
3 T20I's
1 day night test
time that was 3 tests
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sat Jan 11, 2025 10:06 pm
by Durhamfootman
England ODI squad
Knight, Beaumont, Bouchier, Dunkley, Jones (wk), Wyatt-Hodge, Capsey, Dean, Glenn, NS-B, Bell, Cross, Ecclestone, Filer
Australia ODI squad
Healy, Mooney, Litchfield, Voll, Gardner, Garth, King, Harris, McGrath, Perry, Sutherland, Brown, Schutt, Wareham
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sat Jan 11, 2025 10:06 pm
by Durhamfootman
Aussie side looks stacked
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sat Jan 11, 2025 10:42 pm
by GarlicJam
Durhamfootman wrote:3 ODI's
3 T20I's
1 day night test
time that was 3 tests
Indeed
Even as is, the point system is skewed away from test cricket.
it is ridiculous (imo, of course) that winning two 20 over matches gives the same points as winning a 5 day test.
At least they have the test the last match of the series, which is an improvement.
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 6:03 am
by bigfluffylemon
Australia cruising to victory
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 9:52 am
by Durhamfootman
looks like a familiar tale from England. soft dismissals and dropped catches
just won't do against this Aussie side
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 10:22 am
by GarlicJam
bigfluffylemon wrote:Australia cruising to victory
good to see, eh?
Though, it was not without its wobbles.
It was lost in the England innings though. They just didn't score enough, Aus kept them under the gun for much of their innings.
Why did England wait until the 15th over to bowl the #1 ranked bowler (ODI at least) when they needed quick wickets?
A couple of drops, both around key times, added to their woes
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:39 am
by bigfluffylemon
After an abysmal run chase in the second ODI failing to chase a sub par total, England are now on course for an utter thrashing in the third ODI.
Ash Gardner is just a bit good...
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:05 am
by GarlicJam
Durhamfootman wrote:Aussie side looks stacked
and they don't stop replacing fading stars
A very good series for Aus, and must be hugely disappointing for the England team and camp. Australia got better as the series went on, England appeared to go backwards.
Two things I noted in the last 10-15 overs that I did see were the great catch on the boundary by Ash Gardner and the fact that (I think) Alana King had the figures of 0/42 from 5.4 overs. 14 deliveries later, she had 5/46
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:01 am
by Durhamfootman
after 2 matches where England probably only had themselves to blame, they got an absolute thumping in the 3rd. This series is going to be done and dusted long before they get around to the only test match, which is a damned shame, but unquestionably the deserved result
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:15 am
by GarlicJam
England get a good kickstart to go with their change of game format - both Alyssa Healy and Ash Gardner are out due to injury (for how long, as well, is the question).
Testing Australia's reserves.
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:26 am
by GarlicJam
despite those absences, the Aus batting line up looks very strong
Do or die time for England.
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:37 pm
by Durhamfootman
as expected..... when given a choice between do or die, they didn't choose do
Re: Women's Ashes 2025

Posted:
Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:46 pm
by bigfluffylemon
Pathetic.
And even more pathetic, they've allegedly thrown their toys out of the pram about being criticised by the BBC commentators.
England have gone backwards under Lewis. Only Sciver-Brunt looks like she'd get anywhere near this Australian team - even Ecclestone, who's been ranked no. 1 for a while, has been poor. And several, like Bouchier, Knight, Beaumont, Jones and Filer have been nowhere near the level we expect of them. Time to move on, methinks.