Slipstream wrote:https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/ben-stokes-returns-to-england-odi-squad-ahead-of-world-cup-defence-1392741
I can't believe that Brook misses out in the ODI squad for Stokes instead of Roy.
I can
He genuinely struggled like hell in the IPL. I think he had one big score in the entire tournament and played pretty much every game. The franchises worked out how to get him for not very many. Now this is 50 over cricket, but when does he ever play 50 over cricket, so after so many failures in similar conditions at the same grounds and with a perennial winner anywhere and everywhere in Stokes suddenly becoming available as a dedicated batsman, I can understand it
I know nothing about Gus Atkinson, but his is a name that has been bandied about, so in the absence of Archer, that hasn't surprised me either. Roy has been around for a while and has had success in the past, so with Hales retiring, so I can understand that.... don't agree with it... but I can understand it
David Willey's inclusion is the jaw dropper for me..... WTF
That caught me completely by surprise. His only USP is being a leftie, but Curran does that better, does it more reliably, and bats better than Willey too. I'd question how much Willey gets to play. Feels like a luxury pick to me.... might not need him, but good to have around just in case