ddb wrote:Wouldn't you rather give a youngster the chance and establish Sehwag in the middle order. You can't shove Rahane in 2 years time and expect miracles. It's nothing to do with playing the best team anymore, is it? It's building a team for the future, it's transition. You need to long term rather than short term IMO. Otherwise you keep Dravid, Laxman and Sachin for home. They'll perform.
It is no guarantee that he'll be lethal at home either, he had an average series vs WI.
ddb wrote:That's how we've got in this situation. Players perform at home, we extend their rope. Laxman averaged 99 at home vs WI. Dravid went 4 years before 2011 without an away hundred apart from Bangladesh. Hundreds at home kept him in.
Red Devil wrote:ddb wrote:That's how we've got in this situation. Players perform at home, we extend their rope.
So do we not pick our strongest test team at home, and thus risk losing at home?
or should we have slightly different teams for home and away. We recognise conditions by chaning bowlers and playing 2 spinners at home but only one away - why not have a different opener for away tests?

ddb wrote:What you do is have rank turners for the first 2/3 tests of a series. Once you've won them, play on a greentop for the last test
GG - Amir Sohail wrote:ddb wrote:Wouldn't you rather give a youngster the chance and establish Sehwag in the middle order. You can't shove Rahane in 2 years time and expect miracles. It's nothing to do with playing the best team anymore, is it? It's building a team for the future, it's transition. You need to long term rather than short term IMO. Otherwise you keep Dravid, Laxman and Sachin for home. They'll perform.
It is no guarantee that he'll be lethal at home either, he had an average series vs WI.
Couldn't agree more.
Gambhir
Mukund
Rahane
SRT
Sehwag
Kohli
Dhoni
Replace Tendulkar with Rohit as soon as he gets that ton of tons. Let the youngsters get used to test cricket at home so they have experience before the away tours of 2013/14
sportbloggeradi wrote:IMO Indian selectors should avoid the mistake of selecting test match squad on basis of performance of batsmen in ODI's.
cricketfan90 wrote:sportbloggeradi wrote:IMO Indian selectors should avoid the mistake of selecting test match squad on basis of performance of batsmen in ODI's.
compeltely agree...
however jadeja has an extremely good f/c record and is doing really well this season.
Red Devil wrote:GG - Amir Sohail wrote:ddb wrote:Wouldn't you rather give a youngster the chance and establish Sehwag in the middle order. You can't shove Rahane in 2 years time and expect miracles. It's nothing to do with playing the best team anymore, is it? It's building a team for the future, it's transition. You need to long term rather than short term IMO. Otherwise you keep Dravid, Laxman and Sachin for home. They'll perform.
It is no guarantee that he'll be lethal at home either, he had an average series vs WI.
Couldn't agree more.
Gambhir
Mukund
Rahane
SRT
Sehwag
Kohli
Dhoni
Replace Tendulkar with Rohit as soon as he gets that ton of tons. Let the youngsters get used to test cricket at home so they have experience before the away tours of 2013/14
Mukund and Rahane in the side, but no sign of Pujara or Rohit?

D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests