bhaveshgor wrote:Making Spilinters confused here how does Ireland wanting Ireland vs pakistan/Sri lanka or any other game televised not happen/not possible just because ECB gives Ireland money and allows them to the county games. I see no reason why ireland can't do both.
Also your comment on cricket being funded, Developed and Supported by irish cricket is a stupid comment if that was the case in 5-10 years time india could pretty much control every single board do what every their want with their players, fixtures what ever just because they fund, Support and pretty much develop the cricket in that nation now just like you say england does with Ireland.
But I suspect you think that will be wrong.
I suppose all the people objecting BCCI should shut up since they fund, Support and pretty much keep the sport alive and can do what ever they like.
bhaveshgor wrote:Alviro Patterson wrote:When Ireland's rise to claim occured in the 2007 World Cup, 4 players of the 15 man squad consisted of ex-pats (Johnston, Botha, Bray, Langford-Smith) and another 5 consisted of players plying their trade in County Cricket (Rankin at Derbyshire, Niall O'Brien at Northants, Eoin Morgan at Middlesex, Andrew White at Northants, Porterfield played 2nd XI cricket between 2004-2006).
Whilst Cricket in Ireland is better managed than even some test nations, they are nowhere near strong enough to go independent just yet. Ireland's First Class competition of 3 teams playing four 3-day matches hardly compares to the test nations equivalent. TV money is not everything and there is no reason why Ireland can't arrange full ODIs against test nations visiting England or are twiddling their thumbs.
That the point Ireland can't do that because teams won't play because Sky/ECB won't televise the games their have rights to.
Ireland have tried many times to get team to come over or teams that tour england to visit ireland and the tv issue is been a big hurdle.

Making_Splinters wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:Making Spilinters confused here how does Ireland wanting Ireland vs pakistan/Sri lanka or any other game televised not happen/not possible just because ECB gives Ireland money and allows them to the county games. I see no reason why ireland can't do both.
Also your comment on cricket being funded, Developed and Supported by irish cricket is a stupid comment if that was the case in 5-10 years time india could pretty much control every single board do what every their want with their players, fixtures what ever just because they fund, Support and pretty much develop the cricket in that nation now just like you say england does with Ireland.
But I suspect you think that will be wrong.
I suppose all the people objecting BCCI should shut up since they fund, Support and pretty much keep the sport alive and can do what ever they like.
The fact of the matter is, without the ECB and English domestic cricket Ireland wouldn't be half the side they are now.
You've claimed that Ireland can't get games because of the ECBs control of broadcasting rights. Aside from one example, you've not actually proved that to be the case.
The ECB deal has handed Irish cricket a guarenteed additional income, something that they would not have had without it.
A fair few English fans are fed up of hearing the, "poor old Ireland" story. Let's see them put out a side that has not benefited from English cricket and be competitive with it before they, or anyone else has the gall to blame the ECB for Irish cricket's lack of development.
bhaveshgor wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:Making Spilinters confused here how does Ireland wanting Ireland vs pakistan/Sri lanka or any other game televised not happen/not possible just because ECB gives Ireland money and allows them to the county games. I see no reason why ireland can't do both.
Also your comment on cricket being funded, Developed and Supported by irish cricket is a stupid comment if that was the case in 5-10 years time india could pretty much control every single board do what every their want with their players, fixtures what ever just because they fund, Support and pretty much develop the cricket in that nation now just like you say england does with Ireland.
But I suspect you think that will be wrong.
I suppose all the people objecting BCCI should shut up since they fund, Support and pretty much keep the sport alive and can do what ever they like.
The fact of the matter is, without the ECB and English domestic cricket Ireland wouldn't be half the side they are now.
You've claimed that Ireland can't get games because of the ECBs control of broadcasting rights. Aside from one example, you've not actually proved that to be the case.
The ECB deal has handed Irish cricket a guarenteed additional income, something that they would not have had without it.
A fair few English fans are fed up of hearing the, "poor old Ireland" story. Let's see them put out a side that has not benefited from English cricket and be competitive with it before they, or anyone else has the gall to blame the ECB for Irish cricket's lack of development.
Good point TBH ireland CEo have always said england have helped them a lot although they do want more games against full nations.
i don't really have big prove but what I heard is that their lost games because of tv rights.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthre ... p=66221243
this is the biggest prove I can find.
I generally been making this point for a long time and I have had confirmation from it from people that follow ireland cricket that it happens.
All I said is if Ireland wants to qualify automatically they need more games and in the past teams have used tv rights issues to not play them so obviously that need to be fixed for ireland to get more games.
Durhamfootman wrote:Sanga breaking more records. Most dismissals by a keeper is the latest.
Aidan11 wrote:If you have the stomach to read it, here is Paul Downton speaking to The Telegraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricke ... ascos.html

Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests