SaintPowelly wrote:He gave enough abuse on field to warrant a 2 game ban, the racial comments were made afterwards.
rich1uk wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:He gave enough abuse on field to warrant a 2 game ban, the racial comments were made afterwards.
that's not what it suggests in that article
it says the umpires charged him with a level offence for the incident and it is only following subsequent investigation of the same incident that the ECB have decided it should have been a level 3 charge instead
it doesn't say it is a separate charge for a separate incident
regardless of that I still cannot see why using the term kolpak can be considered racist as repeating what I said earlier kolpak can be from a variety of countries and ethnicities , if he had used the term against an aussie kolpak player would he be getting charged with making a racist remark ?
SaintPowelly wrote:rich1uk wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:He gave enough abuse on field to warrant a 2 game ban, the racial comments were made afterwards.
that's not what it suggests in that article
it says the umpires charged him with a level offence for the incident and it is only following subsequent investigation of the same incident that the ECB have decided it should have been a level 3 charge instead
it doesn't say it is a separate charge for a separate incident
regardless of that I still cannot see why using the term kolpak can be considered racist as repeating what I said earlier kolpak can be from a variety of countries and ethnicities , if he had used the term against an aussie kolpak player would he be getting charged with making a racist remark ?
I honestly think he would, remarking about anyones origin is wrong, race ( and racism ) is more than skin colour.
rich1uk wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:rich1uk wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:He gave enough abuse on field to warrant a 2 game ban, the racial comments were made afterwards.
that's not what it suggests in that article
it says the umpires charged him with a level offence for the incident and it is only following subsequent investigation of the same incident that the ECB have decided it should have been a level 3 charge instead
it doesn't say it is a separate charge for a separate incident
regardless of that I still cannot see why using the term kolpak can be considered racist as repeating what I said earlier kolpak can be from a variety of countries and ethnicities , if he had used the term against an aussie kolpak player would he be getting charged with making a racist remark ?
I honestly think he would, remarking about anyones origin is wrong, race ( and racism ) is more than skin colour.
kolpak has nothing to do with someone's origins tho , its a reference to an EU loophole to get around quotas and nothing to do with race in the slightest
rich1uk wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:He gave enough abuse on field to warrant a 2 game ban, the racial comments were made afterwards.
that's not what it suggests in that article
it says the umpires charged him with a level offence for the incident and it is only following subsequent investigation of the same incident that the ECB have decided it should have been a level 3 charge instead
it doesn't say it is a separate charge for a separate incident
regardless of that I still cannot see why using the term kolpak can be considered racist as repeating what I said earlier kolpak can be from a variety of countries and ethnicities , if he had used the term against an aussie kolpak player would he be getting charged with making a racist remark ?

KipperJohn wrote:Many congratulations to the Bells on the birth of a daughter today.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests