captaincolly wrote:Harmison's opinion on Trott's Ashes exit:
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/cr ... ck-6865872
sussexpob wrote:captaincolly wrote:Harmison's opinion on Trott's Ashes exit:
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/cr ... ck-6865872
Where did this "the dressing room must answer all" crap come from? If Trott is on form and healthy then he plays, and I strictly couldnt give a toss whether or not Ian Bell or James Anderson think about it.
At this rate the selectors will short list 50 players for each test, with an alternative voting system being given to each whether by they list their preferences for six potential team mates.
Not sure why you've singled out Bell and Anderson
Arthur Crabtree wrote:The Mirror is claiming that Kirsten turned the job down because the ECB wouldn't let him make decisions such as the one they came to over Pietersen. Surely the most sought after coaches wouldn't want that kind of impediment imposed upon them?
D/L wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:The Mirror is claiming that Kirsten turned the job down because the ECB wouldn't let him make decisions such as the one they came to over Pietersen. Surely the most sought after coaches wouldn't want that kind of impediment imposed upon them?
What they probably really wouldn't have wanted was Pietersen's corrosive presence in the dressing room. There was talk of Kirsten's taking the job well before Pietersen's sacking. Kirsten may have thought that trying to manage Pietersen was part of the job description. Why wouldn't he turn it down?
sussexpob wrote:D/L wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:The Mirror is claiming that Kirsten turned the job down because the ECB wouldn't let him make decisions such as the one they came to over Pietersen. Surely the most sought after coaches wouldn't want that kind of impediment imposed upon them?
What they probably really wouldn't have wanted was Pietersen's corrosive presence in the dressing room. There was talk of Kirsten's taking the job well before Pietersen's sacking. Kirsten may have thought that trying to manage Pietersen was part of the job description. Why wouldn't he turn it down?
While KP is the specific example people will draw on, I think even from a general level he probably didn't want to take the job with the knowledge that the Captain and a few suits had more influence on what happens then he can.
D/L wrote:Just what you'd expect from a nice guy.
No PR going on here at all?
He’s been brilliant for us. He’s worked extremely hard at his game and is always keen to help everyone out. I don’t think he gets enough credit from the press or the people that don’t know him. They seem to have this image of him in their heads, this perception, but he’s not like that at all. He’s very caring. He cares a lot about cricket and he loves the game.
It’s not about whatever else comes with the success for Kev; cricket is number one for him and everything else becomes secondary once the Test matches start. I can see how people sometimes might think that he gets a little bit distracted because he’s got so much going on, but let me tell you, when he gets in those nets, or trains, or plays a match, he forgets about everything else and focuses solely on cricket.
The rest of us don’t play like Kev. He’s unique
Andy Flower wrote:This is going to test my coaching expertise. This is the worst case I've ever seen.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests