Ha...it would be a strange day when SP and I see eye to eye on anything
But seriously : I do not think we are particularly far apart on this . I absolutely agree that the Australian batting was very poor on Saturday ; and further to that I was not particularly surprised as apart from the excellent Smith I would rate them as "distinctly ordinary" as a Test batting side. The bowling excellence often camouflages this fact - as it did in Adelaide - but in general it is "No Smith , No Australia".
My point however that regardless of the Australian ineptitude , the Indian bowling was for the most part extremely well thought out and well directed throughout the day. The field placings were remarkably effective in strangling the scoring rate even in the rare periods where batsmen were at the wicket for some time , despite a very fast outfield. The fact that three catches were taken in the leg trap can , I suppose , be put down to poor strokes or coincidence ; but I would have thought it logically also points to the Indians having done some homework and executed a plan...
The fact that several batsmen made it easier for the bowlers to take their wickets doesn't mean the balls that dismissed them were not "worthy" . Sure , Burns is a limited player badly out of form : but his dismissal was a standard openers caught behind ...had his name been , say , Warner , his wicket would have been at least fifty percent credited to good bowling - less so pressure as he wasn't there long enough to experience it. Although given his season's woes perhaps nine balls without scoring constitutes sufficient pressure anyway
Wade , as BFL says , is no opener , likes to dominate ...but surely his impatience to get after Ashwin was what led to his rash shot , and the fact that he felt it necessary to play it is a tribute to the bowler. Daft shot - or deceived in flight - take your pick. Or both.
And pressure certainly played its part after lunch. I quote Marnus Labuschagne : "People are coming up with new ways.Today they came up with a heavy leg side field and bowled very straight and didn't give us anything scoring options on the off side". Horses mouth , no ?
The pitch indeed assisted the bowlers - and continued to do so yesterday. But it certainly wasn't an all out 200 pitch...and should not have resulted in such a score even in the face of some very good bowling. At the same time , if anyone doesn't think Bumrah and Ashwin in particular bowled consistently beautifully - and should be credited with doing so
even if better batting had resulted in a more "normal" score line - then we must have been watching a different game.
Chicken and Egg ; indeed. Or Snake and Mongoose , if you like...and I think the mongoose deserves a little more credit for winning this particular battle.