Slipstream wrote:Mail - Nick Compton and Samit Patel are set to be named in the England Test squad. :shock:
westoelad wrote:Jordan is becoming a fixture in the squad so possesses something to the selectors which I can't see.
Bell has just tweeted that he's gutted and surprised to be left out. Appears he wasn't forewarned.I'd have thought such a long serving player should have deserved that.
Aidan11 wrote:westoelad wrote:Jordan is becoming a fixture in the squad so possesses something to the selectors which I can't see.
Bell has just tweeted that he's gutted and surprised to be left out. Appears he wasn't forewarned.I'd have thought such a long serving player should have deserved that.
Yes, it's shocking if true. There were worse batsmen in the UAE than Bell but he's been made the fall guy. No doubt the selectors may use the "David Gower" line of being too old but if they do it is worth pointing out he is only one year older than Nick Compton.
Aidan11 wrote:James Whittaker -
"Ian Bell has been an outstanding player for many years and undoubtedly still has plenty to offer England in the future."
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Aidan11 wrote:westoelad wrote:Jordan is becoming a fixture in the squad so possesses something to the selectors which I can't see.
Bell has just tweeted that he's gutted and surprised to be left out. Appears he wasn't forewarned.I'd have thought such a long serving player should have deserved that.
Yes, it's shocking if true. There were worse batsmen in the UAE than Bell but he's been made the fall guy. No doubt the selectors may use the "David Gower" line of being too old but if they do it is worth pointing out he is only one year older than Nick Compton.
Hardly the fall guy. He's averaging under 30 over two years and isn't batting well, and hasn't for a while. It was quite justified to drop him. Though surprising nonetheless. Maybe a rest is what he needs, although he's a one format player now, so won't be, and hasn't been, on the treadmill as much anyway.
Just because it was a shock to him doesn't mean he wasn't told. Do we know he wasn't told, or just inferring it?
westoelad wrote:I would suspect that a tweet stating he was surprised and gutted to be omitted strongly implies that he hadn't beeen forewarned. Having said that given his recent form it certainly shouldn't have come as a surprise. Bayliss' recent comments suggest it's also come as a surprise to him.
yuppie wrote:Agnew reckons Hales will open in SA.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:westoelad wrote:I would suspect that a tweet stating he was surprised and gutted to be omitted strongly implies that he hadn't beeen forewarned. Having said that given his recent form it certainly shouldn't have come as a surprise. Bayliss' recent comments suggest it's also come as a surprise to him.
But it doesn't have to mean he hasn't been told. Aren't we all reacting without knowing? But if he wasn't, that would be poor behaviour. Bayliss is a selector, so it can't have come as a surprise to him.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: mikesiva and 26 guests