dan08 wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Great catch by Plunkett. Could he have overtaken Finn (who would have been first choice before this series)? His extra pace is useful, and he's a better batter/fielder. Difficult to say who England's best three seamers are out of:
Finn
Woakes
Wood
Willey
Plunkett
Jordan
Topley
And maybe, Stokes.
Woakes has had a good tour.
Broad?
365notout wrote:Despite Woakes' redemption, the quality of our death bowling yesterday was poor.
Andy Flower wrote:This is going to test my coaching expertise. This is the worst case I've ever seen.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:If the pitch was as good as the commentators were saying, I suppose you'd expect them to go for a few, and it was only that one over from Woakes that went for many. You can say they didn't land their yorkers, but Pakistan used the crease well. There were a few wides and free hits, it's true. England's death bowling has been better recently. Partly because they have been taking wickets in the middle overs, as Plunkett and Rashid did. Shahid Afridi had a swing, and middled a few. That can happen, even now, though it might suggest that if the top order was still in at the end, the England bowlers might be under more pressure.
365notout wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:If the pitch was as good as the commentators were saying, I suppose you'd expect them to go for a few, and it was only that one over from Woakes that went for many. You can say they didn't land their yorkers, but Pakistan used the crease well. There were a few wides and free hits, it's true. England's death bowling has been better recently. Partly because they have been taking wickets in the middle overs, as Plunkett and Rashid did. Shahid Afridi had a swing, and middled a few. That can happen, even now, though it might suggest that if the top order was still in at the end, the England bowlers might be under more pressure.
I just feel we didn't do our homework. We know what Afridi likes and we didn't bowl strategically enough to counter that.
We have some awesome bowlers but where are our versions of our Narine or Steyn who can smother the final overs of a game?
Probably hard to breed a bowler soecifically for the death; a lot of it is instinct and intuition.
365notout wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:If the pitch was as good as the commentators were saying, I suppose you'd expect them to go for a few, and it was only that one over from Woakes that went for many. You can say they didn't land their yorkers, but Pakistan used the crease well. There were a few wides and free hits, it's true. England's death bowling has been better recently. Partly because they have been taking wickets in the middle overs, as Plunkett and Rashid did. Shahid Afridi had a swing, and middled a few. That can happen, even now, though it might suggest that if the top order was still in at the end, the England bowlers might be under more pressure.
I just feel we didn't do our homework. We know what Afridi likes and we didn't bowl strategically enough to counter that.
We have some awesome bowlers but where are our versions of our Narine or Steyn who can smother the final overs of a game?
Probably hard to breed a bowler soecifically for the death; a lot of it is instinct and intuition.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests