Aidan11 wrote:Samuels and Ramdin are doing a decent job but it's still well behind the rate.
shankycricket wrote:I can still see a case for Bravo because of his all round abilities.
But I'm still awaiting a stats-based argument from mike regarding the basis on which Gayle deserves to be in the ODI side. For all the talk of lack of alternatives, Gayle has done worse than pretty much every one of them over the last 2 and a half years. Johnson Charles YES JOHNSON CHARLES averages around 10 more than Gayle during the same period.
mikesiva wrote:Gayle's numerous injuries and operations have added up, and are affecting his mobility, and his ability to last for long innings. After the World Cup, I expect him to retire from ODIs and Test cricket, and focus on T20s. He is 35, after all, so he might as well take the Mike Hussey route.
Then, shanky and CQ will have to find someone else to blame for the West Indies crappy performances!
ESPNcricinfo @ESPNcricinfo
A golden duck for Chris Gayle. He has only two ODI centuries in more than six years
ChrisQ wrote:mikesiva wrote:there's no way Nash is going to agree to open the batting at his age,
At his age? You realize Nash is only 2 years older than Gayle right? If Nash is too old, why isn't Gayle? And what about Dilshan? Doesn't he open for Sri Lanka? Isn't he older than Nash?
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests