Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Arsenal are certainly stronger in goal now.

And if Wiltshire and Walcott can stay injury free then they will be stronger than last season.

United seem to have some problems, if De Gea does go, who will be the starting keeper after LVG said Valdes is to be sold?

Still not strengthened the CB area, though look much better in midfield. Little light up front. Lots of comings and goings, still no idea what the starting 11 will be next week.

Utd signed the Argentinian World Cup keeper from last year , Sergio Romero

Utd might as well let DeGea go now they have Romero but sell him cheaply to a Spanish club that isn't RM.

After all any money they get this year will be better than what they'll get next year

Romero's a decent keeper but nowhere near good enough to be number one.

Di Maria having a medical. Looks like Pedro could come in.

charity shield hasn't even kicked off yet and I have had enough of Michael owen's commentary

cracking goal from oxlade-chamberlain

Is that about £15m that Utd lost on Di Maria?

dan08 wrote:Romero's a decent keeper but nowhere near good enough to be number one.

Usually trust Tim Vickery for SA football coverage, and he wasnt exactly positive about his keeping qualities

rich1uk wrote:cracking goal from oxlade-chamberlain

Was a very good finish. Looked like Chelsea had a few chances, but couldn't get past their former number one.

Gingerfinch wrote:

rich1uk wrote:cracking goal from oxlade-chamberlain

Was a very good finish. Looked like Chelsea had a few chances, but couldn't get past their former number one.

Ramires has a decent chance that he should have scored but blazed over, and Hazard also blasted over when it was easier to score.

Cech only had a free kick to save (Which he should off) and other than that did nothing

sussexpob wrote:

Gingerfinch wrote:

rich1uk wrote:cracking goal from oxlade-chamberlain

Was a very good finish. Looked like Chelsea had a few chances, but couldn't get past their former number one.

Ramires has a decent chance that he should have scored but blazed over, and Hazard also blasted over when it was easier to score.

Cech only had a free kick to save (Which he should off) and other than that did nothing

I thought he saved from Hazard? I only saw the chance briefly on sky news, so may have that wrong.

Gingerfinch wrote:

sussexpob wrote:

Gingerfinch wrote:

rich1uk wrote:cracking goal from oxlade-chamberlain

Was a very good finish. Looked like Chelsea had a few chances, but couldn't get past their former number one.

Ramires has a decent chance that he should have scored but blazed over, and Hazard also blasted over when it was easier to score.

Cech only had a free kick to save (Which he should off) and other than that did nothing

I thought he saved from Hazard? I only saw the chance briefly on sky news, so may have that wrong.

The only chance I remember from Hazard was not saved, right of the goal one on one....tried to smash it and wasnt close

Think we're on about the same chance. Need my eyes tested.

Reading more about the West ham stadium deal, really can't help but think the tax payer has been ripped off.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33780720

I hope that they are investigated by the EU for state aid. It seems their rent when all the bills are included will be almost rent free. West Ham are claiming this is not the case, but if so, why can we the tax payer not see the whole contract?

I really hope this gets followed up and those responsible are held accountable. And that West Ham are made to pay a fair share for this.